Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-28 Thread Troy Laurin
Merrill Cornish wrote: Jim, How would this differ from using XML comments in the build files? Clumsiness, or lack thereof. XML comments are verbose and stand on a level with the elements they are supposed to be commenting on. Therefore, it's not always clear who they apply to. Personally, there's

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Richard Poole
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions Merrill, /* ... */ and // ... style comments cannot be pinned to a language element any more than a style comment can. I think it is generally accepted that comments precede the thing that they describe. Having said that, I suppose the

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Ryan Cromwell
t; Reply-To: Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:43:38 -0500 (GMT-05:00) Jim, >>> How would this differ from using XML comme

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread jim.holmes
other issues unless this is a seriously low-hanging fruit fix. > -Original Message- > From: Merrill Cornish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:44 AM > To: Holmes, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Merrill Cornish
Jim, >>> How would this differ from using XML comments in the build files? Clumsiness, or lack thereof. or versus XML comments are verbose and stand on a level with the elements they are supposed to be commenting on. Therefore, it's not always clear who they

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread jim.holmes
2004 10:05 AM To: Gert Driesen; Shaber,David; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions Gert, >>> [property descriptions] has never been supported by NAnt ... NAnt now reports >>> unknown elements and attributes. Perhaps NAnt could allow, but ig

Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Merrill Cornish
Gert, >>> [property descriptions] has never been supported by NAnt ... NAnt now reports >>> unknown elements and attributes. Perhaps NAnt could allow, but ignore, a "comment" attribute on all tasks. Merrill --- SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Gert Driesen
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:36 PM Subject: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions Hello, I am looking at converting my build files from .84 to .85 when the new version releases. I was experimenting with a recent version of the nightly code and noticed that pr

[Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-26 Thread Shaber, David
Hello,   I am looking at converting my build files from .84 to .85 when the new version releases. I was experimenting with a recent version of the nightly code and noticed that properties can no longer have descriptions.   This worked on .84 and I was wondering if this can be added bac