Hi all,
We just want to let everyone know that work is being done to upgrade
the nunit2 task to use the latest version of NUnit. This work is
being done in the nunitupdates branch at github.com
(https://github.com/nant/nant/tree/nunitupdates). Feel free to check
it out, fork it, etc but please k
Hmm, some further digging suggests it may be some badly written multi-threading
tests :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2433700/nunit-console-exe-hangs-after-finishing-test-run
I'll fix up the tests and see what happens.
From: David Keaveny
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2010 10:23 AM
To: nant-user
I've inherited a set of build scripts that run under CC.NET, and I'm having
problems with using the NUnit test runner. Nant invokes it without problem, and
the tests run, writing their output to the designated output file, but then the
nunit-console.exe fails to return control to Nant, which jus
Mark,
Running NAnt in debug should at least give you a stacktrace that we can use to
find the cause.
I'm convinced this isn't a NUnit issue, so perhaps we should move this thread
to the nant-users mailing list.
Gert
From: Mark Mayo
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi, I'm not sure if I'm dealing with a nant or an nunit issue.
Clean and build tasks stream results to std out, but the nunit task does
not. It buffers until the C# assembly is done running, and then spits
out all of the output at once.
I've already tried Console.Out.Flush() statements
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 6:27 PM
> To: Erich Eichinger; Bob Archer; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
>
> Erich or Bob, can you verify whether COMPLUS_VERSION
> o
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Ok - obviously I still owe you some piece of information ;-)
I'm want to build & test the same sources against all different platforms +
t: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:14 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
X-ExchangeSecure-AntiSpam: valid(71)
Ok,
Maybe I'm co
To: Erich Eichinger; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
> Hi Erich,
>
> 1) I know about the COMPLUS_VERSION "trick", but instead I
> was planning on including versions of NUnit that have b
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
No prob ;-)
While looking for an easy solution to launch the nunit-console.exe using the
, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Maybe my proposal is misleading:
the "--runtime==" argument from my example is only passed to the
runtimeengine - and only if it is specified in the framework configuration
in nant.
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 10:17
To: Erich Eichinger; 'SPEAR, Adrian, GBM'; 'Bob Archer';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Eric,
Not everyone program you start using will like the --runtime=
argument. Configuring it on the f
t me to it ;-)
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich
Eichinger
Sent: vrijdag 4 mei 2007 10:09
To: Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
After playing around a
;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're wrong on this. Unless if you're sure that your build file will allow
you to run your unit tests on Mono or a specific version of the MS CLR ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
find anything in the
documentation.
tia,
Erich
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Keaveny
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 01:04
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Of course, the alternative solution is t
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Archer
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2007 11:22 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against Nant. But, this is the reason a lot of people recommend
running NUni
mei 2007 16:36
To: Gert Driesen; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
I think it would. Decoupling Nant from a specific NUnit version would be
very useful. Would you have to specify the path the EXE also? I personally
don't in
n'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and
the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec task to invoke the console
ed in the post though ;0)
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 May 2007 17:33
To: SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; 'Bob Archer'; 'Erich Eichinger';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're w
7 16:03
To: 'Gert Driesen'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec t
following some of JP Boodhoo's suggestions.)
BOb
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:52 AM
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I'
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: 03 May 2007 14:52
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I've been planning on adding an nunit-console task would be basically just
be wrapper ar
>From a user standpoint, I could definitely use that...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert
Driesen
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:52 AM
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NU
Would something like this be useful ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against N
Subject: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any
concrete plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As
far as I could see, the nunit task is still compiled against 2.2.8.
cheers,
Hi Erich,
I'll look into this asap. I'm also gonna disucss the possibility to move the
NUnit task to the NUnit distribution with the NUnit team again.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any concrete
plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As far as I could
see, the nunit task is still compiled against 2.2.8.
cheers,
Erich
Hi,
We are setting up a .NET development
tree for our project following the popular guidelines suggested by Mike Roberts
in this document :
http://www.mikebroberts.com/blog/archive/Tech/ArticlesandPapers/Howtosetupa.NETDevelopmentTree.html
The question I have is, do I need to have NUnit
At 04:10 AM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
Hello, again
I have a second question on the way to run NUnit 2.2.5 tests with
nunit2 tasks. I switched from 2.2.0 to 2.2.5 to be able to compile
nunit tests with .NET 2.0, but am now unable to execute them with
NAnt. I saw the bindingredirect element in the
Title: NUnit 2.2.5 rejected by task
Hello, again
I have a second question on the way to run NUnit 2.2.5 tests with nunit2 tasks. I switched from 2.2.0 to 2.2.5 to be able to compile nunit tests with .NET 2.0, but am now unable to execute them with NAnt. I saw the bindingredirect element in
Also I used to use the task (I use the xsl files that
come with CruiseControl now) as well, but one thing I didn't do was use
the task.
You don't say what the error is, but I'm not sure what would happen if
you try to load tasks twice - could the instances conflict? What I did
was just put all
Hi there, if you are having issues with the you could
try just grabbing the xsl and using the task:
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
CowanSent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:04 AMTo:
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [Nant-users] NUnit
reporting
OK,
I’ve asked this before, but here I go
again:
Can anyone tell me how to generate an HTML NUnit
report from
But there is an nunit2report and a nunitreport tag.
I take it these work??
_
VirusChecked for Huntsworth plc
_
OK,
I’ve asked this before, but here I go again:
Can anyone tell me how to generate an HTML NUnit report from Nant.
I have the following target which does not work:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2005 23:02
> To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2
>
> We were planning on holding o
We were planning on holding off upgrading from Nant 0.84 final to 0.85
until the final version came out, but would like to upgrade to NUnit from
2.14 to 2.2 now. I noticed in the release notes that 0.85 RC1 added
support for NUnit 2.2. Does that mean that I need to wait until after we
use Nant 0.
I have some unittests that run
completely fine in nunit-gui and nunit-console. For some reason they
fail (or can be a little intermittent) when run from NAnt. Admittedly,
I think the component I am testing is poorly constructed, and may have
some race conditions, but it's driving me crazy why
Title: NUnit 2.2.2?
Hi there,
Is it possible to run tests build against NUnit 2.2.2.0 on Nant 0.85? I have tried a binding redirect, and either I did it wrong, or it didn't work, since I get output saying 0 tests were run.
Suggestions gratefully received.
Regards,
Richard
I downloaded the rc1 and the sample Build works right off the box. No path
errors with this one.
thanks,
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian MacLean
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Nunit test on sample build failed with VisualCpp
You&#x
Aaron Seet wrote:
Seems like i'm not the only one getting the build failure of 2003 (expected
2004) in 0.84 the first time it's installed :)
After much tracing I found that it checks the copyright notice (as opposed
to the assembly build number + 2000/1/1), so adjusting that to 2004 made it
sweet.
Seems like i'm not the only one getting the build failure of 2003 (expected
2004) in 0.84 the first time it's installed :)
After much tracing I found that it checks the copyright notice (as opposed
to the assembly build number + 2000/1/1), so adjusting that to 2004 made it
sweet.
Anyway, that is n
NUnit (and NDoc) on my blog:
http://blogs.acceleration.net/ryan/archive/2004/12/07/402.aspx
Thanks,Ryan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaroslaw
KowalskiSent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 1:05 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit with
NAnt
Hi guys,
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jaroslaw Kowalski
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004
10:05 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit with
NAnt
Hi guys,
I'd like to know how do you use NUnit with NAnt?
Specifically (I'd like to hear abou
>From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:27 AM
...
> If I'm not mistaken, Charlie Poole (NUnit) actually did not really
recommend
> upgrading to this version. But I'd have to verify that.
Your recollection is more or less correct. The 2.2.1 release is an
ite
er 2004 16:15To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit
2.2.1
I have been upgrading all of my build tools and
noticed that NUnit has made another minor release. Are there plans to
take this minor release into NAnt 0.85?
- Tom
Title: NUnit 2.2.1
I have been upgrading all of my build tools and noticed that NUnit has made another minor release. Are there plans to take this minor release into NAnt 0.85?
- Tom
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
Try "nunit >nunit.out 2>&1"
If that doesn't work try "nunit >nunit.out 2>nunit.err"
You could always try "nunit >nunit.out 2>nunit.out" but I'm not sure
what that would do...
---
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burton,
Kevin
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:23 PM
To: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
Thank you. I was not using the nightly build. Now I am and the tests run
without exceptions. FYI, the docs still reference V2.1 for .
day, September 23, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Burton, Kevin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Burton, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:47 PM
> Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Burton, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:47 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit 2.2?
I remember seeing some discussion of NUnit 2.2 a while back. What was the
conclusion?
I am trying t
I remember seeing some discussion of NUnit 2.2 a while back. What was the conclusion?
I am trying to use and get a whole bunch of exceptions. Is this just not
supported yet?
Kevin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be o
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 3:44 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] nunit works standalone but under nant fails.
I have some tests that test a web service. When I run the tests using the
NUnit GUI the tests work fine but under Nant I get:
[nunit2] NUnit error :Syste
I have some tests that test a web service. When I run the tests using the NUnit GUI
the tests work fine but under Nant I get:
[nunit2] NUnit error :System.NullReferenceException: Object reference
not set to an instance of an object.
[nunit2]
[nunit2]
et it working on my system at work - but not my system
at home.
Thanks - dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:42 AM
To: David Thielen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] nunit assembl
don't have one, you should create one ...
You might ofcourse also have run into a mono bug ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "David Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:44 AM
Subject: [Nant-users] nunit assemb
Hi;
I added
To Nant.exe.config.
I have nunit 2.2 (actually 2.1.91 acording to gacutil)
installed and in the GAC.
I set my task as:
I am wondering what is the best way to specify what order you want the TestFixtures to
be run using Nunit?
Are they being run in the order they are compiled?
Thanks,
Sean
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Yeo
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Nant-users] Nunit showing error in NAnt build but not in Nunit-GUI
Hi everyone,
I was able to run
Hi everyone,
I was able to run Nunit successfully in the Nunit GUI environment with no
errors. When I ran my build script in NAnt, incorporating Nunit script, the
following error was displayed.
The *.Nunit.config and required Dlls are located in the designated folder.
eg. \dotnet\bin\Nunit.
Ca
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Pupek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NAnt Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:33 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] Nunit Failures
> Hey,
> What is the best way of testing for failures during
Hey,
What is the best way of testing for failures during the nunit2 task without
setting the haltonerror to true?
Is there a property
that can be read?
Thanks,
Dan Pupek
Software
Engineer
Advanced Systems
Technology, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(850)
475-4038
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
I've started looking at the NUnit task implementation, with the goal of
adapting it to work with csUnit. I was surprised to see that NAnt
essentially uses NUnit's AppDomain approach, to run the tests directly.
While I understand why this is necessary and useful for NUnit, I don't
understand why th
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] NUnit
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenT
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 23:09, Markel, Kris wrote:
> You should also have these dlls in your bin directory:
> NAnt.NUnit.dll
> NAnt.NUnit1Tasks.dll
> NAnt.NUnit2Tasks.dll
>
> If any of these are missing, the NUnit tasks won't run.
>
> -k
It was that, those files were not compiled. Now Nant detects
NAnt does not recognize the tast . I have a target like:
And Nant gives me:
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(64,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
I noticed a NUnit.Core.dll in my nant directory. Am I missing so
il 08, 2004 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NUnit
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 22:51, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
> ?
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(72,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
--
Pedro Santos
"Si minor plus est ergo nih
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 22:51, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
> ?
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(72,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
--
Pedro Santos
"Si minor plus est ergo nihil sunt omnia..."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
?
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:33 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] NUnit
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linu
NAnt does not recognize the tast . I have a target like:
And Nant gives me:
/home/pre/Projects/orionsbelt/chronos/Chronos.build(64,3):
invalid element . Unknown task or datatype.
I noticed a NUnit.Core.dll in my nant directory. Am I missing s
70 matches
Mail list logo
