RE: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Arnette
> Ian MacLean wrote: > > >> > > yeah - its implemented as an xslt script now - ie it > doesn't execute > > any tasks ( included :) ). Perhaps a better > implementation > > could be written that processes the includes as well. It could > > probably be done with xslt but that may not be the be

Re: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Ian MacLean
Ian MacLean wrote: yeah - its implemented as an xslt script now - ie it doesn't execute any tasks ( included :) ). Perhaps a better implementation could be written that processes the includes as well. It could probably be done with xslt but that may not be the best approach. Do you want to lo

Re: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Ian MacLean
Bill Arnette wrote: Ian MacLean wrote: I tried it out and discovered that if you omit the xmlns attribute on the project in the main build file, it then works. Further testing reveals that if both the main and included build file have the identical xmlns attribute, it also wor

RE: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Arnette
> Ian MacLean wrote: > > > > I tried it out and discovered that if you omit the xmlns > attribute on > > the project in the main build file, it then works. Further testing > > reveals that if both the main and included build file have the > > identical xmlns attribute, it also works. Gary >

Re: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Ian MacLean
Ian MacLean wrote: No, I mean targets. But according to the docs, tasks defined at the project level should be run when at the point the file is included. So I put an task at the project level in my included file and it doesn't get run. I also tried putting a in the included file and then

Re: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Ian MacLean
Bill Arnette wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Merrill Cornish Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:45 PM To: Arnette, Bill; 'nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Nant-users] More task woes Bill, I haven

RE: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Arnette
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Merrill Cornish > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:45 PM > To: Arnette, Bill; 'nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net' > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] More task woes >

Re: [Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-22 Thread Merrill Cornish
Bill, I haven't done it recently, but I've prviously been able to call targets (did you really mean "tasks") defined in an included NAnt script from the calling Nant script. Of course, the include must come before the call to the included target. Merrill

[Nant-users] More task woes

2005-02-22 Thread Arnette, Bill
I am trying to use the Nant task to segregate related targets into include files, but it's not working. If I set verbose="true" on the include task, the output shows it is being included, but if I try to call a target in the included file explicitly or via depends, it says the target is not in th