RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED

2004-05-14 Thread Bill.Martin
static member may be the easiest way forward.   Thanks for you input Henry, it has been very useful.   Cheers,   Bill   -Original Message-From: Price, Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 13 May 2004 17:39To: Bill Martin; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [Nant-users] I

RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED

2004-05-13 Thread Martin Gainty
/manual/CoreTasks/java.html Regards, Martin From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:56:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [62.189

RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED

2004-05-13 Thread Bill.Martin
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED Thanks for that Henry,   It's not quite what I want to do, but it has given me a couple of ideas.  Your idea of defining a property is good, I can do this inside my task and add or modify the property o

Re: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED

2004-05-13 Thread Martin Gainty
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED Henry/BillA)Put all of your mission critical tasks up front in some sort of clean or init target specifying failonerror="true" for all critical tasks B)introduce the concept of task dependencies to lat

[Nant-users] Interim state on a build between SUCCEEDED and FAILED

2004-05-13 Thread Bill.Martin
I have written a custom task to perform a scan on a VS project file when the build is executed to ensure the project complies with standards (it checks that option explicit is set in a VB project for example and checks for files in the archive that aren't part of the project.) The problem I have i