RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-21 Thread Crowhurst,Christian
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 October 2005 17:31 To: Crowhurst,Christian; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly This is a really great addition to this thread, thanks Christian, you've really brought this into clear focus for me!

RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-20 Thread Anderson, Kelly
Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Crowhurst,Christian > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:18 AM > To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly > > I think Troy has summed

Re: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-20 Thread Thibaut Barrère
Hi Kelly because I wanted a seamless build process for developers (they should not be required to learn nant), I've set up a CCNet server which invokes NAnt. The solution task didn't work out well in my context (I met to many cases of failure, mainly because of managed c++ projects ), so I backed

[Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-20 Thread Crowhurst,Christian
I think Troy has summed things up nicely. A small point to add to this discussion that I think is being implied by a number of posts: the build comes in a number of flavours. There's a Private build an Integration build and a Release build (and possibly other variants). Each build is a superset

RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-19 Thread Evan Levy
Title: Re: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly I didn't mean to imply that (our) developers shouldn't or don't build locally.  In our company in fact they do and can catch code errors this way before checking code in.  Whether or not they build locally with Nant is

Re: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-19 Thread Troy Laurin
On 10/20/05, Evan Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what we do. Developers develop with Visual Studio, and the > build automation happens with Nant on the server pulling code from > source control. In fact, our developers don't really need to build > locally at all (but they do anyway).

RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-19 Thread Evan Levy
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anderson, Kelly Sent: October 19, 2005 12:39 PM To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly Should I bite the bullet and require everyone to build with NAnt all the time? Is

RE: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-19 Thread Ryan Davis
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly The developers on my team are used to working in the Microsoft IDE with sln and vcproj files. With NAnt, I have been able to use the task to compile code using this familiar environment. I don't want everyon

[Nant-users] Developers using NAnt Directly

2005-10-19 Thread Anderson, Kelly
The developers on my team are used to working in the Microsoft IDE with sln and vcproj files. With NAnt, I have been able to use the task to compile code using this familiar environment. I don't want everyone on the team to be REQUIRED to learn NAnt to get their job done. So my thought is that th