Re: [Nant-users] 0.85 Dependency Resolution

2004-11-11 Thread Ian MacLean
Gert Driesen wrote: Tom, That is indeed the expected behaviour. If you want to avoid specific targets from being executed more than once, you could use the target::has-executed(name) function. I'm not saying this is perfect, but the old beha

RE: [Nant-users] 0.85 Dependency Resolution

2004-11-11 Thread Gert Driesen
Title: RE: [Nant-users] 0.85 Dependency Resolution Payton,   The target::has-executed() only works on a project level, and the task actually creates a new project on each run.   Gert From: Byrd, Payton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 11 november 2004 16:17To: '

RE: [Nant-users] 0.85 Dependency Resolution

2004-11-11 Thread Gert Driesen
d not allow dependencies to be re-evaluated at all. Gert From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitner, Tom Sent: donderdag 11 november 2004 15:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Nant-users] 0.85 Depen

[Nant-users] 0.85 Dependency Resolution

2004-11-11 Thread Whitner, Tom
Title: 0.85 Dependency Resolution With the following targets defined:                         If I build target B, I get the following results: NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1775.0; nightly; 11/10/2004) Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw http://nant.sourcef