mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 6:27 PM
> To: Erich Eichinger; Bob Archer; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
>
> Erich or Bob, can you verify whether COMPLUS_VERSION
> o
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Ok - obviously I still owe you some piece of information ;-)
I'm want to build & test the same sources against all different platforms +
t: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:14 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
X-ExchangeSecure-AntiSpam: valid(71)
Ok,
Maybe I'm co
To: Erich Eichinger; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
> nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
>
> Hi Erich,
>
> 1) I know about the COMPLUS_VERSION "trick", but instead I
> was planning on including versions of NUnit that have b
ED]>; "SPEAR, Adrian, GBM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
No prob ;-)
While looking for an easy solution to launch the nunit-console.exe using the
, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Maybe my proposal is misleading:
the "--runtime==" argument from my example is only passed to the
runtimeengine - and only if it is specified in the framework configuration
in nant.
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 10:17
To: Erich Eichinger; 'SPEAR, Adrian, GBM'; 'Bob Archer';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Eric,
Not everyone program you start using will like the --runtime=
argument. Configuring it on the f
t me to it ;-)
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich
Eichinger
Sent: vrijdag 4 mei 2007 10:09
To: Gert Driesen; SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; Bob Archer;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
After playing around a
;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're wrong on this. Unless if you're sure that your build file will allow
you to run your unit tests on Mono or a specific version of the MS CLR ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
find anything in the
documentation.
tia,
Erich
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Keaveny
Sent: Fri 2007-05-04 01:04
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Of course, the alternative solution is t
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Archer
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2007 11:22 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against Nant. But, this is the reason a lot of people recommend
running NUni
mei 2007 16:36
To: Gert Driesen; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
I think it would. Decoupling Nant from a specific NUnit version would be
very useful. Would you have to specify the path the EXE also? I personally
don't in
n'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and
the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec task to invoke the console
ed in the post though ;0)
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 May 2007 17:33
To: SPEAR, Adrian, GBM; 'Bob Archer'; 'Erich Eichinger';
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
You're w
7 16:03
To: 'Gert Driesen'; Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger;
nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec t
following some of JP Boodhoo's suggestions.)
BOb
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:52 AM
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I'
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: 03 May 2007 14:52
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I've been planning on adding an nunit-console task would be basically just
be wrapper ar
target framework.
Would something like this be useful ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Would something like this be useful ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against N
Subject: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any
concrete plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As
far as I could see, the nunit task is still compiled against 2.2.8.
cheers,
56 AM
Subject: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any concrete
plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As far as I could
see, the nunit task is still compile
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any concrete
plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As far as I could
see, the nunit task is still compiled against 2.2.8.
cheers,
Erich
22 matches
Mail list logo
