Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Gary Feldman
Bonio Lopez wrote: > Hi Gary, > >> What happens if you just make a change to p22? How would you rebuild it >> > without rebuilding the rest? > I am sorry, but I don't understand where is the difference to the current > approach. The nant will run over all projects and see that p1, p11,

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Bonio Lopez
Hi Gary, >What happens if you just make a change to p22? How would you rebuild it without rebuilding the rest? I am sorry, but I don't understand where is the difference to the current approach. The nant will run over all projects and see that p1, p11, p12,p13 are not changed. So it will not re

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Gary Feldman
Bonio Lopez wrote: > Hi Gary, > Lets take a real example of my current project. > > Project with subprojects, > Let me be more specific. Are these .Net projects (i.e. C#, VB.Net, etc.)? or something entirely different? > p1, p11, p12, p13, p21, p22, p23, > > p11, p12, p13 depend on p1, but not

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Bonio Lopez
) Hope it makes sense, Boni -Original Message- From: Gary Feldman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2006 15:13 To: Bonio Lopez Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request Bonio Lopez wrote: >

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Gary Feldman
Evans, Jonathan (2) wrote: > There are definitely cases where having compiled a couple of base projects > the dependency tree then starts separating off into unrelated branches. And > having compiled one dll it is immediatly possible to start testing or > documenting it whilst the build process

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Evans, Jonathan (2)
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Feldman Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 3:13 PM To: Bonio Lopez Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request Bonio Lopez wrote: > Hi, > Meanwhile quite any machine has more then one pro

Re: [NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Gary Feldman
Bonio Lopez wrote: > Hi, > Meanwhile quite any machine has more then one processor (even Intel with > Dual Core and HT). > Would not it be nice to add multithreading to nant? As starting point I > could imagine to add some attribute to task, like > > >

[NAnt-users] Feature request

2006-07-19 Thread Bonio Lopez
Hi, Meanwhile quite any machine has more then one processor (even Intel with Dual Core and HT). Would not it be nice to add multithreading to nant? As starting point I could imagine to add some attribute to task, like The de

[Nant-users] Feature Request: Ability to monitor status of a service

2005-07-27 Thread Stephen Tunney
I want to be able to see if a service is starting, running, stopping, or stopped from within a NAnt script. This would allow me to NOT run a stop command on a service that is not running, and therefore avoid getting an error when really there is no need to error out. The "failonerror" attribute i

[Nant-users] Feature request: ${nant.verbose} property

2005-06-14 Thread John Ludlow
Hi I had an idea for a relatively simple (but useful!) feature. Could we have a property (you could do it as a function, but that would seem like overkill, to me) which tells you whether the -v parameter was passed on the command line? The reason I ask this is that, while certain NAnt targets wi

RE: [Nant-users] Feature Request: Failed/success property

2005-02-14 Thread Chris Fewtrell
That's EXACTLY what I am after - brilliant. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 February 2005 14:27 To: Chris Fewtrell Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Feature Request: Failed/success property Chris Few

Re: [Nant-users] Feature Request: Failed/success property

2005-02-14 Thread Troy Laurin
Chris Fewtrell wrote: Hi In build scripts, often I want to carry on executing the script even though the last task has failed (ie. use failonerror="false") but I would like to know that the preceeding step has failed so I can do some different processing to normal. What do you think of the

[Nant-users] Feature Request: Failed/success property

2005-02-14 Thread Chris Fewtrell
Hi   In build scripts, often I want to carry on executing the script even though the last task has failed (ie. use failonerror="false") but I would like to know that the preceeding step has failed so I can do some different processing to normal.    What do you think of the idea of having a

Re: [Nant-users] Feature request: building complex cross-platfrom-cross-technology projects

2004-08-18 Thread Ian MacLean
As usual -- patches welcome. The ant-contrib ( not NAnt-contrib ) has a ccTask that would be a good candidate for porting: http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/cc.html of course there is nothing stopping you from using to call out to makefiles for the c/c++ parts and having a 'mixed' build for no

[Nant-users] Feature request: building complex cross-platfrom-cross-technology projects

2004-08-18 Thread Jacek Blaszczynski
Title: Feature request: building complex cross-platfrom-cross-technology projects Hello! Currently I am working on packaging new math library written in C#/C++ (unmanaged) into user friendly binary and source distros. My plan is to base it on NAnt with source part. Unfortunately, when I hav

[Nant-users] Feature request: another way to include dependencies in builds

2003-10-29 Thread nantbfraser
There has been a lot of recent activity around the task. Most people seem to be using this to ensure that their builds proceed in the correct sequence. Just for interest, I'd like to share an idea I had when I first started using NAnt. For large projects, it still seems to be a better solution t