On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Ian MacLean wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an
exception is going to be a huge problem.
we have commented - and then some. Take a look at:
Doh. Missed that.
the consensus right now is that the param solution is
I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an
exception is going to be a huge problem. This is because NAnt works
exactly opposite in the way users expect, and it has gone unnoticed until
this change.
Commonly programs are configured such that the command line arguments
