Re: [Nant-users] Known bug in Nant?

2004-12-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
eason... we all make interesting implementation and design decisions that look odd from the outside. I look at some of the things I've done no more than a couple months and weeks ago and wonder what my reason was :) On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 03:35:36 +0100, Mateusz Åoskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [Nant-users] Known bug in Nant?

2004-12-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
> have a work-around, since they'll be stuck with the same problem. It's > probably worth mentioning on whatever list is used for Slingshot > maintenance about this bug. > > - Brad > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:46:06 -0500, Ryan Cromwell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Nant-users] Known bug in Nant?

2004-12-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Has anyone contacted either the MSDN newsgroups or MS support to report what very well could be a bug? Then everyone would be happy :) On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:26:06 -0600 (GMT-06:00), Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> XML is a standard and IMHO is specified to be followed. > > True

Re: [Nant-users] ... 0.85

2004-11-03 Thread Ryan Cromwell
s. Original Message Follows From: "Gary Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ryan Cromwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] ... 0.85 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:45:27 -0500 > I replaced 'asdf' with 'dosomething' in the email to av

RE: [Nant-users] ... 0.85

2004-11-03 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:08 AM To: Ryan Cromwell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Nant-users] ... 0.85 You're asking NAnt to execute target asdf, which doesn't exist in any of your build files. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[Nant-users] ... 0.85

2004-11-03 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I'm beginning the journey of upgrading our build scripts to 0.85 in anticipation of a release coming in the near future. I've run into a road block though... it appears is not working at all. Take a look at the two build files below and let me know if I'm doing something odd - these scripts work

RE: [Nant-users] Release Notes Using Nant

2004-09-27 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I would suggest looking at CruiseControl.Net.  It produces just what you are looking for in it's xml log files every build. Original Message Follows From: murty dronamraju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: murty dronamraju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Nant-users] Rel

RE: [Nant-users] nunit2 failing - no message, several other problems

2004-08-29 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Dave - NUnit, or the CLR really, will resolve references just like any other assembly/application.  Take a look at the following link.  If you need to resolve references outside the basic working directory or GAC options, the codebase element of hte .config file is always an option. http://msdn.mi

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

2004-08-27 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I really like this idea.  I know we've toyed with the idea of a .build xslt which could be used to make a more 'natural' published build to our CM website and comments would make it that much better. Original Message Follows From: Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Merrill Cor

Re: [Nant-users] What is Nantpad worth?

2004-08-24 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Holy crap!  Where did you get VS.net for $29?!?!  Should you be publishing that fact :) Original Message Follows From: Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] What is Nantpad worth? Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:28:49 -0600 I have to agree. I wr

RE: [Nant-users] RE: XSLT Generated Build File with COM references

2004-08-12 Thread Ryan Cromwell
http://radio.weblogs.com/0106046/VSConvert.xslWe have decided against this in most cases.  We instead are tmpimp'ing our tlb's and sticking them in a "ThirdParty" area.  Because the interop assemblies don't have to be registered, we don't then have to worry about registering anything on the build

RE: Property change-suggestions, was RE: [Nant-users] can't overwrite property

2004-08-12 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Your first snippet wouldn't compile in C#.  You can't define two variables within the same scope or parent/child scope.  Maybe i'm missing something, but allowing that via some scope naming/definition mechanism would be thoroughly convoluted in my opinion.  Explicitly defining the scope would be c

RE: [Nant-users] Xml build report

2004-08-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Try bootstrapping your build scripts.  That is call your current build from a new bootstrap.build which then executs a task, followed by a task.  I personally would suggest looking into CruiseControl.Net (http://ccnet.thoughtworks.com). Original Message Follows From: Lamont Adams <[EMAI

Re: [Nant-users] Typed properties

2004-07-20 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I think this is an excellent idea, especially with the introduction of expressions.  Without expressions, i don't see nearly as much benefit. I'm a little confused as to your use of scripting languages as a argument against type safety.  Scripting language types are resolved at runtime.  Depending

[Nant-users] Clover.Net

2004-07-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
http://www.theserverside.net/news/thread.tss?thread_id=27132   Grab an eval - the demo's are impressive. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital se

[Nant-users] Release Plan

2004-06-30 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I realize this has been put on the floor before, but is there a concensus as to some target dates for completing a next release?  There seems to be a significant amount left in the 0.8.x task list, but I would propose that between bug fixes, task updates, and expressions a release is within sight. 

RE: [Nant-users] Valid Framework Identifiers

2004-06-23 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I'm not positive as i don't use the nightly builds, but seems that it should be net-1.1, net-1.0, mono-1.0, etc Original Message Follows From: "Bonnett, Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Nant-users] Valid Framework Identifiers Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:36:49 -

Re: [Nant-users] Visual Studio .Net caching assemblies

2004-06-17 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Regarding the Windows Installer stuff, take a look at the following blog.  We are using this technique to promote along our test/dev chain and it has been VERY successful. http://weblogs.asp.net/lorenh/archive/2004/05/09/128899.aspx?Pending=true The follow-up blog notes a somewhat annoying issue w

RE: [Nant-users] Initiating a remote nant build

2004-05-17 Thread Ryan Cromwell
try one of the following -- wmi, scheduled tasks, or Sysinternals psexec. Original Message Follows From: "Jonni Faiga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Nant-users] Initiating a remote nant build Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:01:18 +0200 Hi, Any ideas of what is the

Re: [Nant-users] get version from dll?

2004-04-30 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Man - i can't wait until 0.85 is release :)  I'd love to start using functions, but we just can't concider using a nightly for a production buildsserver. Original Message Follows From: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "Price, Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [Nant-users] More Questions on Versioning...

2004-04-22 Thread Ryan Cromwell
i would suggest using version task's revisiontype=increment for the daily build and revisiontype=automatic when you are going to test.  Major and minor or done manually to the .version file that is maintained by the version task.  I think that would follow your scheme Original Message Follows-

RE: [Nant-users] XSLT to generate build files

2004-04-20 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Stephen Boom mentioned that I missed the NDoc.xslt include.  This was just a result of my very half-a** attempt at cleaning the VS.Net Project to NAnt build.xslt.  It just includes your NDoc task content.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan

Re: FW: [Nant-users] Wix!!!

2004-04-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
> > > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian >>MacLean Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:21 AM >>To: Ian MacLean >>Cc: Ryan Cromwell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [Nant-use

Re: [Nant-users] Wix!!!

2004-04-06 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I completely agree - msi2xml and nant msi tasks are all more than sufficient, but i'm excited to see this unprecedented move towards community collaboration. Original Message Follows From: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Ryan

[Nant-users] Wix!!!

2004-04-05 Thread Ryan Cromwell
How exciting would an NAnt Wix task or refactoring of the NAntContrib - Msi/Msm tasks be!  Maybe I'll work on a transform for vdproj -> Wix xml.   http://blogs.msdn.com/robmen/archive/2004/04/05/107709.aspx http://sourceforge.net/projects/wix Tax headache? MSN Money provides relief with tax tips, t

RE: [Nant-users] Labeling and Versioning

2004-04-01 Thread Ryan Cromwell
The NAntContrib version task will increment the version number and return the new one in a property.  You don't have to provide it the current version, it persists that to disk.  You then use the asminfo task to create a new AssemblyInfo file.  asminfo is a task in NAnt core. A couple months ago I

Re: [Nant-users] Question about style task in latest nightly build

2004-03-18 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Why was this removed?  I would presume that to be a big breaking change. Original Message Follows From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zigomanis, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Question about style task in latest nightly build Date: Thu,

[Nant-users] NDoc Online Library

2004-03-09 Thread Ryan Cromwell
This post is definitly in the wrong place, but I can't find any NDoc user group that has any substance to it.  Point one out and I'll ask the question there.   Anyways, I'm curious to here about people's experiences publishing there HTML help documentation.  We have been generating MSDN and CHM hel

RE: [ndoc-devel] RE: [Nant-users] NDoc Initialize Failure

2004-02-29 Thread Ryan Cromwell
Wonderful.  I recompiled the MSDN Documenter as well with a fix using a temporary path in the temp folder rather than the the application path - all's been well since. For those interested - the contention problem, at least this one, is on line 166 of MSDNDocument.cs Original Message Follows--

[Nant-users] arg... if task or some other conditional

2003-12-31 Thread Ryan Cromwell
I have created a script task which populates a property solution.projects with a | delimited string.  This is all fine and dandy, but web projects return web urls.  I could use DirectoryServices to look up the physical path of the url while still in the script, but i really want to use the NAntCont