. I'm wondering if older versions of NAnt
used to allow that.
And:
I realize that the task isn't available on Linux, and in the
meantime I would like to try to build a somewhat complicated sln without
having to build a NAnt script byhand. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mono/Linux? I'm tending towards blaming Mono more than NAnt at this point, but I have limited experience with it. I want to be able to compile it myself out of pure stubborness, or at least understand why it doesn't work. Thanks very much,Dustin Aleksiuk
--
ought
it was normal and let it sit there. :)
Regards,
Dustin Aleksiuk
ontinue to have trouble I'll post the exact error message I'm getting after trying it tomorrow. That batch file is working for now. Regards,Dustin Aleksiuk -"Bill Arnette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -To: "'Dustin Aleksiuk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hmm. I'll have to think about that. We have a pretty complex build that involves some VB.NET, VB6 and a lot of C++. We check the solution file in because it handles the dependencies, which are kind of complex. We're in the middle of a migration to .NET which will slowly begin to simplify things. Th
the batch file: "D:\APPS\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Common7\IDE\devenv" thesolutionfile.sln /build debug That seems to work fine. Thanks again,Dustin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -To: Dustin Aleksiuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nant-users@lists.sourceforge.netFrom: Merrill C
, because "Micros~1" and "Micros~2" work fine. Any ideas? Thanks,Dustin Aleksiuk
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.