created in the root of a
> drive, if all available directory entries are full you can have
> weirdness.]
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Bevan.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
> Weiss
> Sent: Sa
I've been editing a NANT file that does delay-signing and then creates
policy files. After running the file, NANT suddenly started throwing
the following errors, regardless of what build file I feed it (even a
simple "hello world" build file fails).
C:>\nant -f:test.build -debug
(numerous loadtask
On May 11, 2007 5:56 AM, Bob Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep should be doable.
>
> Something like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> BOb
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [
On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a what appears to be long known bug with the task in
> that it launches notepad awaiting a user to edit/close it before
> continuing. Clearly this is not at all desirable in an automated build.
>
> I found this posting from two y
I'm sure you've already found your solution, but just in case - a
quick Google turned up:
http://www.instrumentalservices.com/content/view/40/74/
and
http://objectsharp.com/cs/blogs/dave/archive/2004/08/18/email-notification-from-nant.aspx
On 4/5/07, Nikesh Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm
On 2/9/07, Vee Harwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use it currently for one of our products and nant for the other.
> >From my own personal experience, I would have to say that management
> types I deal with hold VBP in higher regard since it has a nice and
> shiny interface that nant doesn't.
I'm trying to pass the CCNetLabel property as an argument in an Exec
task, but what's actually being passed is $(CCNetLabel}.
The relevant bits look like:
Build number is ${build.number}
Is anyone calling Visual Build from a NANT script? We're slowly
transitioning the entire build to NANT tasks, but for now, we need to
still be able to run what's not been migrated. The trouble is, my task
loads VBuild with the project, but does not seem to be interpreting
the command line arguments
