ANT has ways where I can manage my classpath all over the place, but Nant has
no such equivalent. As a result, when I run my Nunit tests, I have to copy DLLs
all over the place just to make the tests run.
I would like to know if I can programmatically adjust the path for things like
Nunit and Ndoc
Erv Walter wrote:
How will you be "porting" your .NET code to Linux and Mac? Mono? If
so, Nant works on Linux with Mono today, and I assume it would work on
Mac as well as soon as Mono works on Mac (if it doesn't already).
The main difference between Nant and Ant is what tasks are
available
Ian MacLean wrote:
Berin,
Its a good idea. We've just implemented referencable datatypes in NAnt
so adding a path datatype shouldn't be too hard. Looking at the
description of in the O'Reilly Ant book I see it can contain either:
nested elements
nested elements or
nested elments
this seems a
Ian MacLean wrote:
Berin,
Its a good idea. We've just implemented referencable datatypes in NAnt
so adding a path datatype shouldn't be too hard. Looking at the
description of in the O'Reilly Ant book I see it can contain either:
nested elements
nested elements or
nested elments
this seems a
[RT] -> Random Thought
At the risk of pulling a "hit 'em and split 'em" just before I go on vacation,
I would like to propose something. I have been a Java developer for a few years
now, and I am very used to the way ANT works. I was quite happy to see a .NET
version available since I am now req
