Hi,
On Oct 17, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Markus Ewald wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 4:01 PM, Markus Ewald wrote:
>> On 10/17/2010 3:21 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Hey Guys,
>>>
>>> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that
>>> it would be a welcome change?
>>>
>> Is there any Pro
On 10/17/2010 4:01 PM, Markus Ewald wrote:
>On 10/17/2010 3:21 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that
>> it would be a welcome change?
>>
> Is there any Problem we're having that git would solve?
> I hear that git does fa
On 17/10/2010 2:21 p.m., Ryan Boggs wrote:
How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that
it would be a welcome change?
What would this achieve?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Taking an open source project that targets the .NET framework and moving
it to a DVCS
On 10/17/2010 3:21 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that
> it would be a welcome change?
>
Is there any Problem we're having that git would solve?
I hear that git does faster branching/merging, but afaik the NAnt
repository is
the owner of the library is not allowing access to that library by nant.exe
determine the owner of mscorlib.dll
login to the OS using the mscorlib.dll owners credentials
reinstall NANT (specifically nant.exe) using the owners credentials
re-run the app
*gruss*
Martin
___
I'm not a developer on the project, so my opinion doesn't really count, nor
frankly do I have an opinion either way anyway, but why would you suggest a
change? Aside from any personal preferences you may have, what would the
*project* gain from such a switch, and why would that make changing
worth
