Re: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hey Chris, I added the additional readregistry item you emailed earlier to the nant.exe.config file. It should be in the next nightly release that is being uploaded now. Please test and report any other problems you guys see. Thanks, Ryan On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Christopher Brandt wr

[NAnt-users] More fun with net-3.5

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Brandt
What's the rationale for inclusion in the list of reference assemblies for each target framework? I'm looking at the NAnt.exe.config file again. It appears to be a complete list of all the framework libraries. If it is then the list is missing: System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.dll Which I beli

Re: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Ryan Boggs
Actually, this is something that keeps coming up because of the way Microsoft has been organizing the sdk directory structures since 3.0. We have been just dealing with them as they come in so there may be other reg keys out there that we don't know about yet. Please keep these emails comin

Re: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi, On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Brandt wrote: > This is related to my previous post on Windows 7 & VS2008. > > After some help I realized that the target framework on my desktop > was .Net 3.5 whereas on my build server (Windows 2003 Server) it > was .Net 2.0. The was causing so

Re: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Brandt
The problem only exists if you have a wonky version of the 6.0 SDK. Most seemed to be named 6.0A, but on our server it was installed as just 6.0. --- Chris. Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection. - Mark Twain On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Bob Archer wrote: > I use the

Re: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Bob Archer
I use the latest nightly and it works ok. But, I explicity let the targetframework property in the scripts. I also use the msbuild task rather then the csc task.. but I assume it uses the same mechanism to determine which to use. BOb From: Christopher Brandt [mailto:xtopher.bra...@gmail.com]

[NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Brandt
This is related to my previous post on Windows 7 & VS2008. After some help I realized that the target framework on my desktop was .Net 3.5 whereas on my build server (Windows 2003 Server) it was .Net 2.0. The was causing some problems between the two environment in how csc.exe was importing includ

Re: [NAnt-users] Windows 7 with VS2008

2010-03-25 Thread Christopher Brandt
My Windows 7 desktop and my Windows 2003 build server have pretty similar configurations. Most importantly, both have csc.exe in the \Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\V2.0.50727 and \V3.5 folders. How does NAnt determine which version of csc to use? Could this be the difference between my machines,

Re: [NAnt-users] Progress update and upcoming NAnt 0.90-alpha1

2010-03-25 Thread Charles Chan
Hello Bob, > I'm not also sure what .Net 4.0 support means. ... Support for .NET 4.0 means the usual Target and Runtime support, same as what you see on the for .NET 1.0/2.0/3.0/3.5 on NAnt's homepage. > Will I be able to move forward and set that value to net-4.0 in .90? How will > that work?

Re: [NAnt-users] Progress update and upcoming NAnt 0.90-alpha1

2010-03-25 Thread Stephan King
We use git here and it has worked out incredibly well. Our integration with NAnt and CC.NET is really tight, and like Bob said, the control given over branching is so simple yet so powerful. I second the rec. Stephan -Original Message- From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com] Sent

Re: [NAnt-users] Progress update and upcoming NAnt 0.90-alpha1

2010-03-25 Thread Bob Archer
I saw the comment about moving away from CVS. Might I suggest you consider moving to Git? Github is a great resource and free for Open source projects. It makes branching/forking the project very easy. BOb > -Original Message- > From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net

Re: [NAnt-users] Progress update and upcoming NAnt 0.90-alpha1

2010-03-25 Thread Bob Archer
Wow... that's great news. I also want to thank everyone involved in this project. It has enabled me to perform automated builds for several years now. I reviewed the bug fixes and see a few things I reported fixed. That's good to see. One concern I have is that .Net 4.0 support is planned for e