Re: [NAnt-users] Error - VS.NET 2005 sln not supported in 0.86

2008-01-25 Thread Dix, John
That's cool. Thanks for your help! From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:25 AM To: Dix, John; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Error - VS.NET 2005 sln not supported in 0.86 Hi John, The support for VS 2005 solution

Re: [NAnt-users] Error - VS.NET 2005 sln not supported in 0.86

2008-01-25 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi John, The support for VS 2005 solutions (and projects) is provided through that assembly. Without it, support for VS 2005 solutions is not available. Hence, the error is correct. I would rather not add error messages stating "make sure you did not make any mistakes when you extract the dis

Re: [NAnt-users] Error - VS.NET 2005 sln not supported in 0.86

2008-01-25 Thread Dix, John
Hi Gert. Somehow that directory didn't make it into my installation point. I added it and now it reads the SLN file fine. If I may make a suggestion perhaps an appropriate error message pointing to missing binaries would be better than stating that the SLN is incompatible. Thanks for your help!

Re: [NAnt-users] Error - VS.NET 2005 sln not supported in 0.86

2008-01-25 Thread Gert Driesen
Hey John, Can you check whether you have an assembly named NAnt.MSBuild.dll in \extensions\common\2.0 ? Thanks, Gert _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dix, John Sent: donderdag 24 januari 2008 22:44 To: Gert Driesen; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Su

Re: [NAnt-users] Minor mistake in documentation for cvs-tag andcvs-rtag

2008-01-25 Thread Gert Driesen
Hey Alex, This is now fixed in CVS. Thanks for reporting it! Gert _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roebuck, Alex Sent: vrijdag 25 januari 2008 12:03 To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Minor mistake in documentation for cvs-ta

Re: [NAnt-users] Minor mistake in documentation for cvs-tag and cvs-rtag

2008-01-25 Thread Roebuck, Alex
The examples for make the same mistake, and also show a "module" parameter, which is not valid for cvs-tag. Regards, Alex. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roebuck, Alex Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 9:59 AM To: nant-users@l

[NAnt-users] Minor mistake in documentation for cvs-tag and cvs-rtag

2008-01-25 Thread Roebuck, Alex
In the examples for both cvs-tag and cvs-rtag, parameter called "tagname" is used, but it actually is "tag". Regards, Alex Roebuck. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual