Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Weiss
On 2/9/07, Vee Harwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We use it currently for one of our products and nant for the other. > >From my own personal experience, I would have to say that management > types I deal with hold VBP in higher regard since it has a nice and > shiny interface that nant doesn't.

Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread William_Martin
You don't need to go as far as NAntContrib - have a look at the task in NAnt. http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/tasks/servicecontroller.html Cheers, Bill From "Phil Sayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@lists.sourceforge.net Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/02/2007 14:43 To cc Su

Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread Bob Archer
Yes it is not hard. We use the exec tag to run IISREST to stop and start our QA IIS server while our deploy to qa build is running. Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans, Jonathan (2) Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 9:50 AM To: 'Phil

Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread Evans, Jonathan (2)
Failing NAntContrib having service start/stop you could always call out to "net start" and "net stop". Jonathan Evans -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Sayers Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:44 P

Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread Phil Sayers
i'd bet there's something in Nantcontrib that'll do the service start/restart. i'm about to start using nantContrib to mainpulate our webserver to deploy builds to our IIS box as a remoting server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vee Harwell

Re: [NAnt-users] Visual Build Pro Question

2007-02-09 Thread Vee Harwell
We use it currently for one of our products and nant for the other. >From my own personal experience, I would have to say that management types I deal with hold VBP in higher regard since it has a nice and shiny interface that nant doesn't. Functionality wise, I would rate the two as pretty much e