RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Karl Palsson > Sent: woensdag 24 mei 2006 22:40 > To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the > standard IDE compile? What's up? > > > Don't sup

RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Karl Palsson
Don't suppose anyone could expect an actual new release? We're about at the point of just saying, "the nightly from March XX, 2006" is the new company standard. The list is active, the committers are active, what are we missing? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailt

RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Justin, Can you try using the latest nightly build of NAnt (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest) ? Lots of fixes and performance improvements were made since 0.85 RC3. Let us know if that improved build times. Gert > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Justice Gray
Projects are all in VB.NET.  No C# or C++.  Version number is 0.85.1932.0.Any other info that is needed, please let me know!-JusticeOn 5/24/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of> Justice Gray> Sen

RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Justice Gray > Sent: woensdag 24 mei 2006 20:41 > To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard > IDE compile? What's up? > > Hey there, > >

[NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the standard IDE compile? What's up?

2006-05-24 Thread Justice Gray
Hey there,I have a NANT script running against an 85-project solution file with most references being project references.  The behavior of this build script has me a little puzzled though.  When NANT is first executing, it chugs through about half of the projects in the solution in very good time. 

RE: [NAnt-users] Setting up NUnit for a web application

2006-05-24 Thread Owen Evans
I’m not sure what you’re after but if you are asking about how to unit test web apps. It might be best to ask on the nunit lists, but I will say that you should become aware of the Humble Dialogue concept. I find that this aid’s unit testing our ASP.net applications no end. http://c2.com/

RE: [NAnt-users] built-in properties

2006-05-24 Thread Owen Evans
The things you are after are the functions.   Ie ${build.dir} will be populated by project::get-base-directory   Take a look at http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/functions/   Cheers Owen   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert H

[NAnt-users] built-in properties

2006-05-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Where in the docs can I find a list of Nant’s built-in properties?  I see references to things like ${build.dir} but I can’t find a list of these.  

[NAnt-users] Setting up NUnit for a web application

2006-05-24 Thread Ahmed, Shabana
Hi All,      Does any body have a good step by step document on how to set up your Test Project using Nunit for a web application? I mean, a comment which explains how to separate web forms/ UI  test classes from business test classes, data access layer test classes.      Is it a good practice t

[NAnt-users] Do type libraries have to be registered to be recognized by the task?

2006-05-24 Thread Foster, Richard - PAL
Title: Do type libraries have to be registered to be recognized by the task? Hi there, I'm trying to get a library to build successfully under CruiseControl. The machine in question does not have a full copy of Visual Studio installed, so I cannot confirm if the operation would be the same