[Nant-users] Link Error - solution task

2005-10-06 Thread Ko, Youngji
Hi there, I have a VC++ solution with two projects in it where one project is dependent on a static lib generated by the other project. When I compile, I get the following link error. ... [link] Starting 'link (@"C:\DOCUME~1\yko\LOCALS~1\Temp\tmpB5D.tmp" /INCREMENTAL:NO /OPT:REF /SUBSYSTEM:WIND

[Nant-users] Ndoc Task

2005-10-06 Thread Flanakin Michael C Ctr HQ OSSG/OMR
I'm sure this is a popular question, but is it possible to use an NDoc-created config file with the  task? The docs don't specify that it can, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed.   _ Michael Flanakin Dynamics Research Corporation HQ OSSG Dashboard HQ OSSG/OMR 334.416.

[Nant-users] NAnt silently removing some of my assembly references from build commands

2005-10-06 Thread Kamil Skalski
Hi! I found a very disturbing behavoiur of NAnt (I'm using 0.85rc3) Let us suppose I have a following build script: and now let's say I placed my lib2.dll somewhere around, but not in the place visible to nant/csc. Now what happens

Re: [Nant-users] How to manage asynchronous tasks

2005-10-06 Thread Martin Gainty
Gentlemen I havent fully investigated the situation but from my understanding Unless you are willing to Create a win32 binary which implements CreateProcess (where you can control Task priority) and then have Nant implement the exec task on the Win32 binary you would be essentially exec'ing a syn

Re: [Nant-users] How to manage asynchronous tasks

2005-10-06 Thread Brass Tilde
> I'd be interested to hear what issues you have with the vb6 task so that > we can look at fixing them. Thanks Just to clarify, it was the original poster, Mr. Schneider, who was having the problem, not me. For me, it works splendidly. Brad ---

RE: [Nant-users] How to manage asynchronous tasks

2005-10-06 Thread Robert Schneider
> >But one question still exists: Is it possible that the checkreferences > >attribute doesn't work? I have seen into the source code, and if I > >haven't overlooked something then there is no use for it. Okay this works too. > No bother. > Still, hopefully. Robert -