Kelly Anderson wrote:
> All of the "marketing" for NAnt seems to indicate that it is a
> replacement for make.
> ...
> Sure, you CAN write a make system with a shell script, but the beauty
of
> make was that the dependency checking was implicit and built in. It
> seems with NAnt that you have to
On 9/15/05, Bill Arnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With my suggestion, 'nant -only:projectC' would only do the body of the
> projectC target and not execute the dependencies without cluttering the
> build file with dependency-only targets, or with if statements and unless
> attributes that short
So the implicit dependencies are in the tasks...
This would be one reason you would want to have a task instead of using
exec, right?
-Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Feldman
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:18 PM
To: nant-
Bill Arnette wrote:
I asked a similar question a while ago and never got a response. Basically
my question was what is the Nant equivalent of a C++ makefile?
There is no answer to that, because there's no such thing as a canonical
C++ makefile. Perhaps you have in mind the NMake files th
This is NOT a NAnt bash. I am NOT complaining. I am trying to gain
insight into NAnt.
All of the "marketing" for NAnt seems to indicate that it is a
replacement for make.
My experience thus far with it (and I am admittedly something of a
newbie) is that it is more accurately a replacement for she
Hi There,
I am trying to compile a .csproj file – using the
solution task in a nant buildfile – keeping it very simple
Here are the contents of my buildfile – I am completely
new to this – any assistance would be great
xmlns="http://nant.sf.net/nant.xsd">
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anderson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:04 PM
To: Bill Arnette; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without
dependencies
Bill,
W
Bill,
Wouldn't your approach invoke:
even if libZ were up to date? Is this a bad thing? It seems so
from an efficiency standpoint. In comparison to make, it seems to me
that most NAnt scripts I've seen seem to do more work than the makefile
even though it is expressed much mo
