[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although your right, whats the point of a debug build on your build
server?
We do it because the way we use NCover, it needs to have the debugging
symbols.
Gary
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy L
First off, kudos to the ccnet team for improving the Vault support. I
am a *lot* happier with the user filters, get source and labeling
support for Vault now. Nant did an okay job, but as far as notification
went, it was just a hair "too late."
Anyway, I am trying to update to the latest version
Ok I get your point... We're using direct calls to devenv.exe instead of compiling everything ourselves... This leads to a couple of issues (one is scalability!) but for us it was finally the best option.
In your situation would it be acceptable to have two separate targets in one build script ?
Title: Message
I am
calling MIDL , CL etc as individual task in NAnt. They basically have different
optins depending on release or debug, I currently have code
like
Hi Trevor
I build both in the same NAnt script using a for loop like:
foreach>
then in the build target :
[Nant-users] Building C++ with differenct configurations
Title: Message
Hi,
what does everyone do to build release and debug versions of your
c++ projects. Is it preferred to have separate NAnt scripts for each, or should i just set different compiler options in one script, depending on which configuration is being built?
Thanks
Trev
---
Title: RE: [Nant-users] RESGEN and SOLUTIONS - newby confusion.
It's definitely improved.
Looks like I'm down to about 4 minutes from 40.
Big improvement.
Thanks guys..
-Russ
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 10:43
Is there a way to force nant to remove all directories even if they're
not empty?
--
Perry Ismangil
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
