RE: [Nant-users] 0.85 msi install

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jim Geurts > Sent: woensdag 1 december 2004 18:46 > To: Gert Driesen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Nant-users] 0.85 msi install > > Hey Gert, > > I'm not sure if this was brought up or no

[Nant-users] Strange VSS behaviour

2004-12-01 Thread Stephen Gryphon
Strange VSS behaviour - Using vssget task in NAnt (actually NAntContrib), I was encountering a "The get operation failed. \n Version not found" error. After some searching on the web I found that the problem only occurred when (a) I was using a version label in the vssget, a

[Nant-users] 0.85 msi install

2004-12-01 Thread Jim Geurts
Hey Gert, I'm not sure if this was brought up or not. I haven't been following the lists very closely lately, but are you intending to build/provide msi installs of NAnt/NAntContrib with each beta/release? I plan on grabbing rc-1 tonight and verifying that the msi target works as expected. It

RE: [Nant-users] Solution task

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Hamzah, I'm not sure if the stdole PIA is part of .NET, but I know it is definitely part of Office and available for download (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;328912). Hope this helps, Gert > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:31 > To: Gert Driesen > Cc: 'Nik Derewianka'; 'Nant-Users (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation > with mono on Linux > > Gert Driesen wrote: > > > >

Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread Ian MacLean
Gert Driesen wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian MacLean Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:03 To: Nik Derewianka Cc: Nant-Users (E-mail) Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux Nik Derewian

RE: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ian MacLean > Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 6:03 > To: Nik Derewianka > Cc: Nant-Users (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation > with mono on Linux > > Nik Derewia

Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread Ian MacLean
Nik Derewianka wrote: Ian MacLean wrote: The reason we skip it on linux is because mcs does not support the /doc argument which generates the xml used by ndoc. However a patch for this will soon be applied to mono svn so we'll build it then. So i was a bit premature in my success declarations wi

[Nant-users] Solution task

2004-12-01 Thread Hamza Zeen-Aldin
I moved my builds to a new build server and now the solution task gives me this error. Everything worked fine with Win server 2000 and Nant .85 the new server is on Win 2003 and VS is not installed on it. Only the .NET framework and Nant and needed 3rd party Dlls. Below is the error I get. Thank

Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread Ian MacLean
J. Christopher Six wrote: I bypassed use of the Makefile and was able to successfully build nant by directly issuing: mono bin/NAnt.exe -f:NAnt.build build Curiously, this is identical to the command that is invoked by running "make" under a non-WinNT environment. I'm still uncertain why it was

RE: [Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthew Mastracci > Sent: woensdag 1 december 2004 21:38 > To: Gert Driesen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior > > Okay... this time for sure

[Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior

2004-12-01 Thread Matthew Mastracci
Okay... this time for sure! The next nightly should have a working bin/** pattern. I changed the bin/** regex to match bin(?=$|/).*, which is optimized to bin(?=$|/). I didn't run any perf tests on this one, but it I think it should be pretty straight forward for the regex system to test. T

[Nant-users] Re: Segfault during compilation with mono on Linux

2004-12-01 Thread J. Christopher Six
I bypassed use of the Makefile and was able to successfully build nant by directly issuing: mono bin/NAnt.exe -f:NAnt.build build Curiously, this is identical to the command that is invoked by running "make" under a non-WinNT environment. I'm still uncertain why it was segfaulting under make

Re: [Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior

2004-12-01 Thread Gert Driesen
> - Original Message - > From: "Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems Engr.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 5:57 PM > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Nant-users] "Filtering" NAnt log

2004-12-01 Thread Nicola Iuretigh
No suggestion for this? Thanks, Nicola - Original Message - From: "Nicola Iuretigh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: [Nant-users] "Filtering" NAnt log > Hi all... > > My NAnt log is too long... > Because

RE: [Nant-users] Re: FileSet Behavior

2004-12-01 Thread Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems Engr.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Unfortunately, NAnt doesn't delete the folders. I suspect > > that this is > > >because the folders are not empty. > > Yeps > > > The help suggests that I can specify > > >a folder to be deleted with all of its sub-folders. This obv

Re: [Nant-users] Re: Nant-users digest, Vol 1 #1240 - 15 msgs

2004-12-01 Thread Brad Wilson
You could, presumably, write a task that enumerates through the running processes, finds the process in question (if it's still alive), and waits for it to disappear. Let me ask the question this way: it would appear that this would be a general problem for your service. Does the Services control

[Nant-users] Re: Nant-users digest, Vol 1 #1240 - 15 msgs

2004-12-01 Thread Hamza Zeen-Aldin
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:12:34 -0600, Byrd, Payton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the problem here isn't that the ServiceController task isn't waiting > for the service to stop, but that there is an underterminable amount of time > between when the service controller releases until all of the