Re: [Nant-users] Problems with new NDoc BaseReflectionDocumenter

2004-09-24 Thread Kevin Downs
Thanks for the repro - it was very helpful :) The problem with managed C++ assemblies has been resolved and a fix has been committed to the NDoc CVS. Hopefully, it should make its way over to Nant in the near future... regards, Kevin [NDoc Admin] -

[Nant-users] Problems with new NDoc BaseReflectionDocumenter

2004-09-24 Thread Loren Halvorson
I'm trying NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1724.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 9/20/2004) and notice that very recently the NDoc stuff was updated "...to newer NDoc build that also supports documenting assemblies without slashdocs" This change seems to be causing problems for me when documenting one of my proje

[Nant-users] Solution Task setting

2004-09-24 Thread Ceely, Aron D
I am currently working with a VS.Net solution that includes a web project.  I am listing the following snippet from my build file in the hopes that someone can assist me.                                       

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property > Gert Driesen wrote: > > >- Original Mess

RE: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Daniel Nguyen
+2! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:11 AM To: Merrill Cornish Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85 +1! this release deserve *at

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread Ian MacLean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Ian MacLean wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an exception is going to be a huge problem. we have commented - and then some. Take a look at: Doh. Missed that. the consensus right now is

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Thibaut Barrère
+1! this release deserve *at least* 0.90 Thibaut On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gert, > > Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it > should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread Ian MacLean
Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property the consensus right now is that the param solution is probab

Re: [Nant-users] Version for Linux,

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
John, I suggest using a recent nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds). You should be able to use the binary distribution out-of-the-box. Gert - Original Message - From: "John Sanabria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:55

[Nant-users] Version for Linux,

2004-09-24 Thread John Sanabria
greetings, i'm linux user and i did not found a version of the nant for linux different to debian, and i had install mandrake. Some suggestions and how to compile the source under linux, i try to compile nant with make linux-bootstrap and i got the next error mcs -target:library -define:MONO

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Merrill Cornish
Gert, Considering the wide range of new functionality in upcoming release, perhaps it should be call 0.90 rather than 0.84, since it's a _lot_ more than 1% better than what it will be replacing. :-) Merrill --- This SF.Net email is sponsore

Re: [Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hoi Rutger, We are close to a new release, but there's still a few things left to do. Currently, I'm very busy preparing a presentation, and fixing/reporting Mono bugs ... I hope to have more time in about two weeks, and I hope to start the next beta cycle within two weeks after that (so the 0.85

[Nant-users] stable release for version 0.85

2004-09-24 Thread Rutger Dijkstra
Could someone from the development team tell us when we may expect a 'stable release' of version 0.85 The latest stable version (0.84) is now almost a year old and tons of useful stuff has been added since. Though I do not mind working with a nightly build privately, I need an 'official' version

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread rsdhatt
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Ian MacLean wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an exception is going to be a huge problem. we have commented - and then some. Take a look at: Doh. Missed that. the consensus right now is that the param solution is

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a re

Re: [Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread Ian MacLean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an exception is going to be a huge problem. This is because NAnt works exactly opposite in the way users expect, and it has gone unnoticed until this change. Commonly programs are configured such that the

[Nant-users] RE: can"t overwrite property

2004-09-24 Thread rsdhatt
I think the change in .85 to make overwrite a read-only property an exception is going to be a huge problem. This is because NAnt works exactly opposite in the way users expect, and it has gone unnoticed until this change. Commonly programs are configured such that the command line arguments