[Nant-users] nant 0.84 string::replace

Hello all, I was wondering if there's a way I could use the script task to implement nant 0.85's string::replace function. Is it possible to do this in nant 0.84? If so, how? Thanks, Felice --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblog

RE: [Nant-users] Bad COM registration

Unfortunately I cannot. The project involved is sensitive in nature and I can't demonstrate any of the source. If I get time I'll see if I can reduce the problem to a minimal set that is sanitized. In the meantime, I have worked around the problem by uisng an exec call to devenv which builds the

Re: [Nant-users] Bad COM registration

Steve, Can you provide a small repro for this issue ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: "Steve Mitcham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 6:00 PM Subject: [Nant-users] Bad COM registration I am using the latest nightly build (8/25 I believe).

[Nant-users] Bad COM registration

I am using the latest nightly build (8/25 I believe).  I am having a problem with a C++ COM server dll and the solution task.  When I build the DLL from inside the IDE everything is fine, however, when I build the DLL through the nant solution task I am getting a 0x80070002 error when attemp

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

Title: RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions Merrill, /* ... */ and // ... style comments cannot be pinned to a language element any more than a style comment can. I think it is generally accepted that comments precede the thing that they describe. Having said that, I suppose the 'comme

RE: [Nant-users] [Fwd: Multi build file dependancies]

You could fake it by calling within its own target. Something like: Then you can depend on that project using the normal depends attribute: ... The naming is still problematic, but at least you don't need to have one huge build file. -- Edwin G. Castro Firing Systems Engineer [EMAIL

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

I really like this idea.  I know we've toyed with the idea of a .build xslt which could be used to make a more 'natural' published build to our CM website and comments would make it that much better. Original Message Follows From: Merrill Cornish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Merrill Cor

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

Member, method/function/procedure and class comments can easily fall in the same area you're talking about with these comments, and I don't think too many folks get overly lost with those... You've got a nice point, but my $0.02 is that I'd rather see the developers working other issues unless

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

Jim, >>> How would this differ from using XML comments in the build files? Clumsiness, or lack thereof. or versus XML comments are verbose and stand on a level with the elements they are supposed to be commenting on. Therefore, it's not always clear who they

RE: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

>>Perhaps NAnt could allow, but ignore, a "comment" attribute on all tasks.<< How would this differ from using XML comments in the build files? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Merrill Cornish Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:05 AM To: Gert Dr

Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

Gert, >>> [property descriptions] has never been supported by NAnt ... NAnt now reports >>> unknown elements and attributes. Perhaps NAnt could allow, but ignore, a "comment" attribute on all tasks. Merrill --- SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [Nant-users] Properties Descriptions

David, This has never been supported by NAnt. What has changed in recent nightly builds, is that NAnt now reports unknown elements and attributes. Previous versions of NAnt did not have this capability. Gert - Original Message - From: "Shaber, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROT