> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael A. Angelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 7:01 PM
> Subject: [Nant-users] NAnt vs. Setup and Deployment projects
>
>
> I have a general question that is causing debate here. I am a Java guy new
> to t
Because of connectivity issues with sf.net, I've been unable to upload a new
nightly build today.
I'll let you know when I have one ready ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew W. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew W. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:28 PM
> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Licensing Components
>
> You're quite right, of course! That was a bit of an aggressiv
I'm afraid there isn't much we control here... I would suggest hitting up
sf.net support, or checking on the mailman site for a user guide...
:(
Don't forget to look here too.
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
BTW. A digest seems to be sent when the message (digest) reach a
You're quite right, of course! That was a bit of an aggressive fix...
I'm using the task. I'll run three tests against a minimal
example
1a) Run using the current build
1b) Run using my (less aggressively) modified version - which just takes
out the IsLicensed thing.
2) Run using 0.83 build
3) R
Matthew,
I know too little of licensing in .NET itself, but commenting out that code
will render the license task useless, as this code will then just create an
empty licenses file, no ? :
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(licensesFile, FileMode.Create)) {
// note the ToUpper() - this is
Whomever this may concern.
I have the my list preferences set to get digest, which I get, but I
still get all the individual emails... Help !
Also, can the digest be a bit bigger? I mean, a digest with 3 messages
isn't cutting down on my inbox by much.
Thanks,
Bob
---
Title: Message
Re Bug #932073
I'm the original
submitter of the bug
Has not been worked
on as far as I know, I haven't had the time to verify, but obviously you are in
the same boat as I am.
All a standard .NET
license file is a text string that is compiled into a resource and linked
i
I have a general question that is causing debate here. I am a Java guy new
to the .NET platform. Ant was a big player in my arena. Now that I am in the
.NET arena, I am trying to find a reason why to use NAnt rather than the
Setup and Deployment projects.
The argument I am getting here is that if
Title: Message
Ok. Sounds good. Thanks for the tip.
Evan A. Bonnett
Reynolds and Reynolds,
IT ERA Integrated
Desking Development
-Original Message-From:
Ryan Cromwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April
22, 2004 12:10 PMTo: Bonnett, Evan A;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gert,
Attached you'll find a simple reproduction of the issue I described with
the ASIS attribute. I added a few comments in the file to point out
what's going on.
To reproduce, drop the 2 attached files into a new directory, and
run nant. It will generate 2 dlls and touch the source file.
i would suggest using version task's revisiontype=increment for the daily build and revisiontype=automatic when you are going to test. Major and minor or done manually to the .version file that is maintained by the version task. I think that would follow your scheme
Original Message Follows-
Hi Nicklas,
I am the author of the VDProjConverter project. I have also done some work
on the msi/msm tasks for NAntContrib. I have only tested the
VDProjConverter with some mocked up setup projects that I have created, so
I'm sure there are bugs in the conversion. Unfortunately, I have yet to
Title: Message
Ok,
last question on versioning... I think.
Gert
and others,
You
say that when using the asminfo task, you should just use the # of days since a
certain date (I forget which date but I think it's the date VS was
released?)
Currently, I use the major.minor.build.revision
Title: Message
Hi folks.
From the Nightlies of the 20/04 we've had
to comment out the following:
// try {
//
LicenseManager.CreateWithContext(tp, dlc);
// } catch
(Exception ex) {
//
Title: Message
I'll fix it this evening or tomorrow.
Thanks for the report.
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Nicklas Norling
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:11
PM
Subject: [Nant-users] Nightly April
21'st
Seems there has
sneaked
The latest nightly doesn't give me this problem anymore, but I did
also have it with earlier versions.
/Nicke
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael A. Angelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 21 april 2004 21:24
> To: 'Gert Driesen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Attemp
Title: Message
Hi.
I'm trying ot get
the MSI task to build an MSI we've been having VS.NET 2003
build
so far. I've read
all documentation I've been able to find, including the WiKi but
still
have a few
questions.
I found the vdproj
converter and used it to generate a snipplet of code f
Title: Message
Seems there has
sneaked in an error from the nightly 03-20 to 04-21.
Trying to compile my
old trusty solution that worked with 03-20 and
that now errors out
with:
[solution] Starting solution build.
Nima,
I assume
VS.uses NET the System.Resources classes to
read resx files and write resources. However, we can't do this as this
would mean that NAnt would generate resource files for the framework version on
which its running, meaning we'd lose support for multiple
frameworks.
This i
Any hints on this issue are greatly appreciated…
I am attempting to run a build (listed at the bottom of this
email) that applies a label in VSS. I am using the vsslabel task and am
getting the following error when the vsstask is executed:
C:\Development\Build\ gc.build(32,4):
lab
I’m using
latest nightly build of NAnt (i.e. Build 0.85.1565.0) and I ran into a problem
with the Solution task:
I’m using
a custom UI control in my solution. It’s built in another solution and is
referenced here as an external assembly.
Everything is
fine when I’m building with VS.NET. B
Hello,
I have been trying to get the MSM task to properly package
files and I seem to run into this problem no matter how simple the build file.
Any assistance would be appreciated,
Thanks,
Mike
testmsm:
[nant] C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\PORTAL\test.include
23 matches
Mail list logo
