Re: [Nant-users] NAnt support of DOCTYPE/ENTITY

2003-10-21 Thread Scott Hernandez
properties.xml should look like this: The task loads and includes another build file. (note: It must be a valid build file that can be used alone:) You might want to think about this more in terms of user customizations for your build, and not just including properties. It can allow

RE: [Nant-users] NAnt support of DOCTYPE/ENTITY

2003-10-21 Thread Mark Colburn
I tried that, but Nant complains that there is more than one root node in the file if there is more than a single property set. -mark -Original Message- From: Nick Varacalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:09 PM To: Mark Colburn; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: [Nant-users] NAnt support of DOCTYPE/ENTITY

2003-10-21 Thread Nick Varacalli
Look at the task in the NAnt help. Nick Varacalli http://www.varacalli.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Colburn Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 17:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Nant-users] NAnt support of DOCTYPE/ENTITY I

[Nant-users] NAnt support of DOCTYPE/ENTITY

2003-10-21 Thread Mark Colburn
I'm building a relatively large system that is broken into a number of smaller build files using NAnt. There are a bunch of properties that I would like to be able to use throughout the build process, but still allow users to build components without having to use the master build file. I tried p

Re: [Nant-users] Nant Link task issue...

2003-10-21 Thread Ian MacLean
no difference really just a different syntax. Children arg elements are common to all tasks that derive from externalProgramBase. it would look somghting like although you would propbably have make this the last arg. I think link.exe requires the list of libs after the / options. I'm thinking t

Re: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes

2003-10-21 Thread Gert Driesen
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes Good catch, I'll fix it this evening ...   Gert - Original Message - From: Dmitriy Bezugliy To: Gert Driesen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Loggin

RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes

2003-10-21 Thread Nicklas Norling
Hi Gert. You where right, I did not close the record. When I do that I get some stuff into the logs. Enough for me actually. Still not all as you say. I would be glad if someone better then me could look into this. Seems logging is awfully hard to do. /Nicke -Original Message- From: Ger

[Nant-users] slingshot - blanks in solution files

2003-10-21 Thread Eckert, Alexander
hi, i'm using slingshot to convert my solution files to buildfiles. i encountered the problem, that if the project names contain blanks, slingshot crashes or produces empty buildfiles. -> no blanks in projectnames greetz alex --- This SF.

RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes

2003-10-21 Thread Dmitriy Bezugliy
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes Hi Gert Using record with level led to next Internal Error I use next directive in nested build tasks. May be action must be different ? [license] Compiling license file c:\acrm\src\Core\Oblik.DMS\licenses.licx to C

RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes

2003-10-21 Thread Nicklas Norling
See comments below: How come ? You can : > - log to a file using the -logfile commandline option The -logfile option keept the logfiles locked so I could not zip nor email the logs while running the script. > - log build results as an SMTP message (using the NAnt.Core.MailLogger) MailLogger doe

Re: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes

2003-10-21 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Nicklas Norling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Gert Driesen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nicklas Norling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 9:01 AM Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Logging failures or successes > Hi Gert. > > You where