Are use using tlbimp via the exec task, or the tlbimp task. If the latter,
then I think it would be better if you fixed the tlbimp task (and send us
the patch), rather than putting another workaround.
The beauty of Nant is the minimal set of configuration that needs to be done
out of the box. (I'm
Hi,
I added a page to the Wiki at
http://nant.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Specifying%20.NET%20Framework%20V
ersions that explains how to target different versions of the .NET Framework
with Nant. Please take a look at it and make sure I got it right.
Thanks,
Mark
- Original Message
Kevin,
the good news is that tlbimp is being moved into nant from nantcontrib
and is now framework aware - meaning that you will not have to have
tlbimp.exe on the path. This is a post 0.83 change though.
Ian
Thank you that did the trick.
Unfortunately our project is using tlbimp which does
Hi,
I have a short question
regarding Nunit integration. I want to create a HTML file from my NUnit Console
command within a Nant build file. Does anyone know how to write the contents out
to a HTML file??
I currently have
This produces outout to the screen, I want this in
Daniel,
Thanks. I see this is a new flag in 0.8.3. I am using 0.8.2.
Thanks,
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Mark Priest'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users
Mark,
-k (or actually /k) flag in Nant version 0.8.3 means -defaultframework. If
you type "nant -help" in the command line, you will see it. Hope this help.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Mark Priest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Jarek,
There does not appear to be a -k flag for Nant.exe. What did you mean by
using the -k flag?
Thanks,
Mark
a.. From: Jaroslaw Kowalski
b.. Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Using multiple versions of framework
c.. Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:41:48 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject: [Nant-users] problem with 0.8.3rc1 on VS.NET 2003
>
> Unhandled Exception: System.Configuration.ConfigurationException:
> Error loading XML file c:\winnt\microsoft.net\fra
> ework\v1.0.3705\Config\machine.config Request for the permission of
> type System.Securi
> What you (of course) need to do is comment out the version="v1.0.3705" /> line in NAnt.exe.config(line 121). The other line I
> referred to is about what framework NAnt TARGETS, not the one it runs
> against.
That did the trick. Thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Unhandled Exception: System.Configuration.ConfigurationException:
> Error loading XML file c:\winnt\microsoft.net\fra
> ework\v1.0.3705\Config\machine.config Request for the permission of
> type System.Security.Permissions.StrongNameIden
> ityPermission, mscorlib, Versi
Thank you that did the trick.
Unfortunately our project is using tlbimp which does not work unless the
framework tools are in the path. So I still need vcvars32.bat settings
present.
-Original Message-
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:14
Try
asis="true"
instead of frompath="true".
This is based on the fact that csc.exe from a particular CLR is able to
locate the correct system libraries, when you don't specify the path name. I
think it's good enough.
I believe, that unless you want to rely on your PATH variable, you should
avoi
Here are my (non-official) thoughts:
Setting currentframework and/or changing the default in nant.exe.config
is the correct thing to do. Along with that, you should remove the
frompath="true" attributes.
I can't think of a scenario where you would want frompath="true" on a
reference. For your
We are targeting the 1.1 framework. We changed our build scripts to
include:
However I noticed that 1.0 dlls were still being referenced for
assemblies referenced via frompath="true". The cause was the fact that I
had the builds running from a ".NET command prompt" or a command
environment with
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt
Hmm. I
guess I have some more homework to do. I am not familiar with Mono. I'll have to
check it out.
Thanks
to all for the information! I may have some more questions
soon.
Ryan
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL P
Erv Walter wrote:
How will you be "porting" your .NET code to Linux and Mac? Mono? If
so, Nant works on Linux with Mono today, and I assume it would work on
Mac as well as soon as Mono works on Mac (if it doesn't already).
The main difference between Nant and Ant is what tasks are
available
This is correct. Hopefully when we get a proper installer it will prompt
the user at install time as to which installed framework version to use
by default.
Ian
You probably have the 1.1 version of the .NET framework installed but Nant
uses the 1.0 version by default. The version of the .NET f
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt
How will you be "porting" your .NET code to Linux and
Mac? Mono? If so, Nant works on Linux with Mono today, and I assume
it would work on Mac as well as soon as Mono works on Mac (if it doesn't
already).
The main difference between Nant and Ant is wha
I faced this same problem recently. I had to go in to the dos prompt via Visual Studio .NET Command Prompt (in Visual Studio .NET Tools). I'm guessing you could add something to your path, but haven't spent the time yet.mlkxr6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BUILD FAILED
C:\nant\NAnt.build(54,10)
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt
At the moment we use MS Dev 6.0, but we will be converting to .Net soon. Our product line is currently windows only, but we intend to port to Linux and Mac in the near future. I don't yet know what the development environment will look like at that point.
20 matches
Mail list logo
