rt, do you have any advice from working with their ipv6 stuff, yet?
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-Original Message-
From: Robert Glover [mailto:robe...@garlic.com]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:36 PM
To: trit...@cox.net
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cogen
On 10/14/13 3:30 PM, staticsafe wrote:
On 10/14/2013 18:00, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Which other provider? Please name at least one.
Other providers either offer IPv6, or don't. When those other
providers do, good or bad, you can connect to any other IPv6 network
(well, except maybe for
- Original Message -
> From: "Constantine A. Murenin"
> On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran wrote:
> > They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation
> > interval. How reliable are they?
> > Tri Tran
>
> It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
On 10/14/2013 18:00, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Which other provider? Please name at least one.
Other providers either offer IPv6, or don't. When those other
providers do, good or bad, you can connect to any other IPv6 network
(well, except maybe for Cogent's AS174).
When Cogent offers IPv
On 14 October 2013 14:18, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
> It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
> .
>
> Hardly something to hold against them until the rest of us can all get
> our own houses in order...
Which other provider? Please name at least one.
Other providers ei
Cogent is great if you treat them as a path. I wouldn't use Cogent in place
of single homing a service provider though due to how they run their
network and the subsequent peering disputes that arise. Don't get me wrong,
I like Cogent, they definitely have a good use case, just be cognizant of
how
It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
.
Hardly something to hold against them until the rest of us can all get
our own houses in order...
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran wrote:
> > They're
On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran wrote:
> They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How
> reliable are they?
> Tri Tran
It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
Cogent; so, effectively, in 2013, you still can't get IPv6
connectivity fr
We've had them since May 2008. Recently upgraded from 100Mb to 250Mb.
Had minor issues here and there (no outages to speak of).
I've had some IPv6 issues since moving the link to dual-stack a few
months back, but we are not deploying IPv6 to end-users yet, so I'll let
them slide on that.
On 10/
We have several 100Mb Cogent DIA lines in various places, NYC, Boston,
Portland OR, and it works fine.
It isn't the highest quality, but it works well enough for any office/small
hosting needs.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Tri Tran wrote:
> They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster
Let me correct that.
Not very good for pacific international traffic. Atlantic bound is fine.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Bryan Tong wrote:
> We've had them direct for transit in LA for about a year. And a year
> before that in Denver.
>
> Never had any issues aside from some missing BGP
We've had them direct for transit in LA for about a year. And a year before
that in Denver.
Never had any issues aside from some missing BGP when New York was under
water. Great for US domestic traffic. Not very good for international
traffic.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Tri Tran wrote:
>
They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How
reliable are they?
Tri Tran
13 matches
Mail list logo
