Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:33, Derek Martin said: > case here (even if the second part might be)--this feature is only > useful to a subset of a subset of an already small community of e-mail > users. I don't fully agree here. Our use-case of sending update information to customers should not be tha

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:05:15PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Darek, Derek. > > So, acknowledging that this discussion is mostly academic since > > there seems not to be anyone to maintain/support new features... > > Yes, it's still academic and useful, since I plan to patch neomutt(1)

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-15 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Darek, On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:25:29PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 07:10:52PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:41, Alejandro Colomar said: > > > > > > > Thi

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 07:10:52PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:41, Alejandro Colomar said: > > > > > This is breaking behavior, so it needs some more justification than just > > > the above.

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-15 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Werner! On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:41, Alejandro Colomar said: > > > This is breaking behavior, so it needs some more justification than just > > the above. > > FWIW, I am using another patch for 2 years now to send unattende

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-15 Thread Werner Koch
Hi! On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:41, Alejandro Colomar said: > This is breaking behavior, so it needs some more justification than just > the above. FWIW, I am using another patch for 2 years now to send unattended but signed mails. The patch requires a new option to avoid the risk of regressions. S

Re: [PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-14 Thread Alejandro Colomar
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:41:41AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > This is useful for signing patches with git-send-email(1). Here's a > working configuration for that: > > In <~/.gitconfig>, add this section: > > [sendemail] > sendmailcmd = mutt -H - A better approach for

[PATCH] send.c: Allow crypto operations in batch and mailx modes.

2023-11-14 Thread Alejandro Colomar
This is useful for signing patches with git-send-email(1). Here's a working configuration for that: In <~/.gitconfig>, add this section: [sendemail] sendmailcmd = mutt -H - After this patch, all patches sent with git-send-mail(1) will be signed (and even encrypted, if we