Re: problems with step debugging

2014-02-03 Thread Jochen Theodorou
No ideas at all? Am 24.01.2014 12:07, schrieb Jochen Theodorou: > Hi all, > > My question is related to the JVM, but today to the debugging interface > actually. Or o be more exact in what exact cases the JVM gives out the > events when using step filtering. > > The background is that I try to fix

Re: [8] RFR (S): 8033278: Missed access checks for Lookup.unreflect* after 8032585

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Jan 31, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Paul, > > The transformation you suggest is equivalent, but I reluctant to apply it. > IMO, it doesn't add much value and current version is easier to read. OK, i guess we will just have to agree to disagree on that small point as i thin

Re: [8] RFR (S): 8033278: Missed access checks for Lookup.unreflect* after 8032585

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:58 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8033278/webrev.00/ > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033278 > > The fix for 8032585 [1] introduced a regression: in some cases access check > on a reference class is omitted. > > The fix is t

Re: problems with step debugging

2014-02-03 Thread John Rose
Hi, Jochen. I pinged a colleague about this, and here are his comments. Do they help? — John On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > No ideas at all? Begin forwarded message: From: "[email protected]" Subject: Re: Fwd: problems with step debugging Date: January 24,