Changeset: e842be9f6eeb
Author:jrose
Date: 2012-01-06 01:20 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/e842be9f6eeb
meth-lazy: improve unit test
! meth-lazy-7023639.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
h
Changeset: b093159bbe19
Author:jrose
Date: 2012-01-06 01:45 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/b093159bbe19
meth-lazy: correct invokedynamic argument stacking (now runs JRuby tests with
indy)
! meth-lazy-7023639.patch
_
Hi all,
I noticed some of the error message are a bit strange. For example I was
going to use bindTo for a boolean, but primitives are not allowed. The
error message I then get is:
no leading reference parameter
Which makes no sense at all. Looking at the code:
if (type().parameterCo
On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> I see where it comes from, but "reusing" that instead of making a new if
> is not really needed, is it?
>
> Do people here agree this should be improved?
The javadoc for this throw is:
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the target do
Changeset: c1801932163e
Author:twisti
Date: 2012-01-06 20:29 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/c1801932163e
Implemented NamedFunction invokers properly.
! meth-lazy-7023639.bcg.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-d
Am 06.01.2012 17:22, schrieb John Rose:
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>> I see where it comes from, but "reusing" that instead of making a new if
>> is not really needed, is it?
>>
>> Do people here agree this should be improved?
>
> The javadoc for this throw is:
> * @thr
Changeset: 3378e35ffb32
Author:jrose
Date: 2012-01-06 19:28 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/3378e35ffb32
meth-lazy: tweak warning
! meth-lazy-7023639.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
h
