On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 15:21 +0300, lilit-aibolit wrote:
>
> qemu-0.14.1p4.tgz and kqemu-1.3.0pre11p3.tgz in packages.
> is this not work?
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/emulators/kqemu/Attic/Makefile
Also, it's not in packages for 5.1 (I think it got yanked after the
freeze for 5.0
04.05.2012 13:28, Weldon Goree P?P8QP5Q:
On 05/04/12 06:12, Jes wrote:
Hi all:
I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1
packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in
newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance
without kq
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 14:02 +1000, Peter Ericson wrote:
> Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the
> answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not
> likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between.
>
There ce
Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the
answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not
likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between.
Peter Ericson
On 04/05/2012, at 8:28 PM, Weldon Goree wrote:
> On 05/04/
On 05/04/12 06:12, Jes wrote:
Hi all:
I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1
packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in
newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance
without kqemu is horrible. Any solution?
Yes, it w
Hi all:
I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1
packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in
newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance
without kqemu is horrible. Any solution?
Thanks in advance,
Jes
6 matches
Mail list logo