Re: kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-07 Thread Weldon Goree
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 15:21 +0300, lilit-aibolit wrote: > > qemu-0.14.1p4.tgz and kqemu-1.3.0pre11p3.tgz in packages. > is this not work? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/emulators/kqemu/Attic/Makefile Also, it's not in packages for 5.1 (I think it got yanked after the freeze for 5.0

Re: kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-07 Thread lilit-aibolit
04.05.2012 13:28, Weldon Goree P?P8QP5Q: On 05/04/12 06:12, Jes wrote: Hi all: I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1 packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance without kq

Re: kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-04 Thread Weldon Goree
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 14:02 +1000, Peter Ericson wrote: > Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the > answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not > likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between. > There ce

Re: kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-04 Thread Peter Ericson
Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between. Peter Ericson On 04/05/2012, at 8:28 PM, Weldon Goree wrote: > On 05/04/

Re: kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-04 Thread Weldon Goree
On 05/04/12 06:12, Jes wrote: Hi all: I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1 packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance without kqemu is horrible. Any solution? Yes, it w

kqemu in 5.1

2012-05-04 Thread Jes
Hi all: I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1 packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance without kqemu is horrible. Any solution? Thanks in advance, Jes