On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 07:11:42AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 12:16:58PM -0600, Ashlen wrote:
> >
> > XMonad is recompiling and replacing itself with another XMonad process
> > because the current process is called "xmonad" but the compiled
> > configuration should b
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 12:16:58PM -0600, Ashlen wrote:
> Hi, I'm on this snapshot with updated packages:
>
>
> $ sysctl -n kern.version
> OpenBSD 7.1 (GENERIC.MP) #454: Thu Mar 31 09:28:09 MDT 2022
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
>
> sysclean(8) fro
loopback interfaces are special and kind of end up representing an rdomain
inside the kernel, which is where this restriction comes from.
dlg
> On 2 Apr 2022, at 09:36, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I came across an issue that once a rdomain is set on a
> loopback interface
> you cant
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:45:13PM -0500, Luke Small wrote:
> So if it’s a potential vulnerability for the kernel to be linked the same
> without KARL (I presume because if the source code is known and ASLR and
> PIE can potentially be randomly overcome) then can there be a KARL type
> extension fo
Hello,
I came across an issue that once a rdomain is set on a
loopback interface
you cant change it without destroying and re-creating the interace,
while it appears you can change a virtio network interface, is this a
bug or a feature
tobsd# ifconfig lo3 create
tobsd# ifconfig lo3 rdom
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 05:11:35PM -0400, Adriano Barbosa wrote:
> Thank you for your help and sorry for the delay.
> I had to learn how to compile from source and still not sure if I did it
> correctly or if the patch didn't work.
> I downloaded src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz from 7.0 release, updated
Thank you for your help and sorry for the delay.
I had to learn how to compile from source and still not sure if I did it
correctly or if the patch didn't work.
I downloaded src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz from 7.0 release, updated to -current
using cvs and applied the patch. Then, followed only step 3 o
So if it’s a potential vulnerability for the kernel to be linked the same
without KARL (I presume because if the source code is known and ASLR and
PIE can potentially be randomly overcome) then can there be a KARL type
extension for cc/c++ ?--
-Luke
Hi, I'm on this snapshot with updated packages:
$ sysctl -n kern.version
OpenBSD 7.1 (GENERIC.MP) #454: Thu Mar 31 09:28:09 MDT 2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
sysclean(8) from ports recommends to delete
/usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.17.1 and /usr/lib/li
On 2022-04-01, Eric Thomas wrote:
> @Crystal
>
>> If you want to work with the ports tree, it's _much_ better to set up
>> DPB than just running 'make' in the various directories:
>
> Very cool blog! I def spent some time reading. The dpb method feels
> like a litle too advanced for me at this
@Crystal
> If you want to work with the ports tree, it's _much_ better to set up
> DPB than just running 'make' in the various directories:
Very cool blog! I def spent some time reading. The dpb method feels
like a litle too advanced for me at this moment. I'm struggling to
get this UniFi por
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 09:06:05PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Le 29/03/2022 à 12:10, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> > I doubt it is the filters. You run into some sort of memory leak. Please
> > monitor 'bgpctl show rib mem' output. Also check ps aux | grep bgpd output
> > to see why and when the mem
Hmm I get it. Thanks Stuart. You are very helpful as always.
--
Valdrin
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of Stuart
Henderson
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 10:43
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: increasing max value of rdomain/rtable
On 2022-04-01, Valdrin
On 2022-04-01, Valdrin MUJA wrote:
> I want to increase the number of rdomain/rtable from 255 to 1024. I will do
> this at my own risk. I had a look at the kernel code but couldn't figure out
> how to upgrade it. I would be very grateful if you could guide me on this.
> Thanks in advance.
I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo
