I've run into a problem with data corruption, and I'm not sure if it's
in the vic driver or the VMware VMXNET2 code. If someone can nudge me
in the right direction, it would be appreciated.
I have 2 VM's on VMware ESXi 5.1.0. First VM is Debian 7, with eth1
connected to a vswitch in a "Virtual M
I have several computers all running OpenBSD. After the recent Toronto
Hackathon, current is running extremely well with a long standing
xombrero issue resolved.
I am running
OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Thu Jun 13 00:29:17 MDT 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/c
Hi christopher,
After i figured out the npppd config setup (seems there were some recent
syntax changes) it worked like charm.
I post my config files here as soon as i am at home
Jan
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:38:48PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/06/14 21:49, John Tate wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 2013-06-14, John Tate wrote:
>> > >> It doesn't
OK, thanks for the confirmation, at least it's not just me! Let me know if
you need me to test anything on my hardware.
Cheers
Garry
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Thank you for the reply, I have now tried suspending with 'zzz', which
> puts
> > the netbook to sleep w
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:38:48PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/14 21:49, John Tate wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> > > On 2013-06-14, John Tate wrote:
> > >> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> > >> before
On 2013/06/14 21:49, John Tate wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2013-06-14, John Tate wrote:
> >> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> >> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
> >> # route add -net 192.168.0.0
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-06-14, John Tate wrote:
>> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
>> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
>> # route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
>
> Why would you need to do this a
On 2013-06-14, John Tate wrote:
> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
> # route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
Why would you need to do this at all, it seems you are already using
192.168.1.1 as your default
It has a "routers" option and a "static-routes" option.
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.1.65 192.168.1.254;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
option domain-name "wifi.kab.loc";
option static-routes 192.168.0.0 192.168.1.1;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1;
}
On Fri, Jun
Fri 14.Jun'13 at 17:22:44 +1000, John Tate
> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
> # route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
>
> I can't seem to find how to do this in dhcp-options
It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
# route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
I can't seem to find how to do this in dhcp-options(5)
Named won't even start with this...
option static-routes 192.168.1/24 192.168.0.
12 matches
Mail list logo
