On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:15:17PM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>This is probably something stupid I'm doing, but I can't see it right this
>second.
>Trying to build xenocara from sources pulled from
>anon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs
>as of about 60 minutes before sending this email message g
I'm not using for scientific work but for all daily, as servers but also as
workstation, graphical station & sometimes only for scientific work like
calculations of astronomical trajectories...that's all.
>
> From: Zé Loff
> Sent: Tue May 14 08:38:43 CES
On 13/05/2013, at 22:12, Pau wrote:
> on his/her laptop as *only* OS and uses it daily for scientific work?
> please contact me off list. Thanks
Doing statistical consulting for the pharma industry using 99% OpenBSD. Basic
toolkit is LaTeX+R, both edited with vim, and LibreOffice. Plus a lot of
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Pau wrote:
> on his/her laptop as *only* OS and uses it daily for scientific work?
> please contact me off list. Thanks
>
>
I'm not sure if there will be some official readings available (you can try
BSDmag and similar resources), but it's completely possible and
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Clint Pachl wrote:
>
> Would dd'ing to the drive all 1s then all 0s be effective?
>
Yes, and a complete waste of time. 'atactl drive secerase' will do the job
for you.
hdparm in linux has a similar command. But dd-ing twice is just idiotic. If
you must use dd, o
Scott McEachern wrote:
2) Do you mean there could still be data residing on unused parts of
the SSD? Yes, it can happen.
Yes, this is what I'm referring to. I was hoping there was some way to
instruct the drive controller that the entire drive space is "free"?
SSDs have their own way of wear-
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 21:04, Clint Pachl wrote:
> I would like to reinstall a fresh system on an SSD that contains an
> existing installation. From my limited knowledge of SSDs, I wonder if
> the drive controller may "retain" data from the old filesystem, unaware
> that there is a new filesystem
On May 13, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
>>
>> *** Error 1 in lib/freetype (:37 'type1.o': @cc -O2 -pipe
>> -I/usr/xenocara/lib/freetype/include -I/usr/xenocara/lib/freetype/...)
>> *** Error 1 in lib/freetype (Makefile:36 'build')
>> *** Error 1 in lib (:48 'build')
>> *** Error
On 05/14/13 00:15, Marco S Hyman wrote:
This is probably something stupid I'm doing, but I can't see it right this
second.
Trying to build xenocara from sources pulled from
anon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs
as of about 60 minutes before sending this email message gives me
cc -O2 -pipe
On 05/14/13 00:04, Clint Pachl wrote:
I would like to reinstall a fresh system on an SSD that contains an
existing installation. From my limited knowledge of SSDs, I wonder if
the drive controller may "retain" data from the old filesystem,
unaware that there is a new filesystem put in place.
This is probably something stupid I'm doing, but I can't see it right this
second.
Trying to build xenocara from sources pulled from
anon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs
as of about 60 minutes before sending this email message gives me
cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/xenocara/lib/freetype/include
-I/u
I would like to reinstall a fresh system on an SSD that contains an
existing installation. From my limited knowledge of SSDs, I wonder if
the drive controller may "retain" data from the old filesystem, unaware
that there is a new filesystem put in place.
Is this a concern? If so, how does one
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:58:08AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
>
> I just use the base vi(1)
> and then fmt(1) to format the text. Same for mail(1) if use the command
> to write in an external editor.
>
Why not:
set editor="EXINIT=':set wrapmargin=8' vi %s"
in the muttrc? No need for fmt.
--
Flame bait. Not even funny.
Salim Shaw wrote:
>OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
>desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling, IPsec,
>IPv6.
>Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of square
>
>peg/round hole.
>
>
>
>On
You are wrong with your statement that OpenBSD is not designed for the
desktop. We are running several hundred desktop on the enterprise, thin
clients and so on ...
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 17:28 -0400, Salim Shaw wrote:
> OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
> deskto
On 05/13/13 17:28, Salim Shaw wrote:
OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling, IPsec,
IPv6.
Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of
square peg/round hole.
You're quite a comedi
On May 13, 2013 4:33 PM, "Chris Cappuccio" wrote:
>
> Salim Shaw [salims...@vfemail.net] wrote:
> > OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
> > desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling,
> > IPsec, IPv6.
> > Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop
thanks for the prompt replies. Any recommendation for IPMI cards and KVM
over IP switches that work well with openbsd?
Tony
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 03:24 PM, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> I would like to know what kind of environment you
2013/5/13 Chris Cappuccio
> Salim Shaw [salims...@vfemail.net] wrote:
> > OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
> > desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling,
> > IPsec, IPv6.
> > Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of
>
Salim Shaw [salims...@vfemail.net] wrote:
> OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
> desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling,
> IPsec, IPv6.
> Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of
> square peg/round hole.
>
Salim, tha
OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling, IPsec, IPv6.
Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of square
peg/round hole.
On 05/13/2013 05:12 PM, Pau wrote:
on his/her laptop as *on
On 05/13/2013 03:24 PM, Tony Berth wrote:
Dear Group,
I would like to know what kind of environment you use for remote management
of one or more openbsd servers. Which KVM over IP solution would you
recomend.
Oh, I remember those.
Last IP KVM switch I used worked BETTER for OpenBSD than it di
PS: scientific: physics, math, bio, etc...
on his/her laptop as *only* OS and uses it daily for scientific work?
please contact me off list. Thanks
Dear Group,
I would like to know what kind of environment you use for remote management
of one or more openbsd servers. Which KVM over IP solution would you
recomend.
Thanks
Tony
On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:42:48 -0700
Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> The quality of the error checking demonstrated by this crash, btw,
> should have you filing bugs with the claws-mail developers. "Bad
> input files" is not a valid reason to crash; it should be reporting
> what file is involved and t
On 05/13/13 15:19, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:40:59AM +0100, Mike Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have been upgrading my machines to 5.3 this weekend and I am
seeing some strange behaviours with dhclient. The config is simple:
/etc/dhclient.conf
send host-name "pc-1";
reques
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:40:59AM +0100, Mike Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been upgrading my machines to 5.3 this weekend and I am
> seeing some strange behaviours with dhclient. The config is simple:
>
> /etc/dhclient.conf
> send host-name "pc-1";
> request subnet-mask, broadcast-address,
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:32:16 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
existing LACs (in this particular setup, mpd on FreeBSD) - if the LA
On 2013-05-10, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> TemperNTC (http://www.pcsensor.com/index.php?_a=product&product_id=7)
>> uses uthum(4) but has a problem where the sensor drops out occasionally;
>> diff I posted to tech@ improves (but doesn't totally fix) this.
>> This se
Sun 12.May'13 at 15:41:11 -0600, Evan Root
> So Stuart,
> I was looking at the OpenBSD mailing list rules because I
> wasn't sure about long links and I saw that lines over 72
> characters are discouraged, that's were I decided to manually
> put in line breaks. :/
Hi,
I have been upgrading my machines to 5.3 this weekend and I am seeing
some strange behaviours with dhclient. The config is simple:
/etc/dhclient.conf
send host-name "pc-1";
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name,
domain-name-servers, host-name;
(FWIW The dhc
32 matches
Mail list logo
