Hi,
I like to know if the OpenBSD for amd64 is working fine with intel Xeon
processors (64 bit). I am reading here (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD64 ) and here (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon#Xeon_.26_Xeon_MP_.2864-bit.29 ) that
these processors are based on AMD64 instruction set. The
I'm running OpenBSD 4.0 in VMware workstation 5.5.3 build-34685 linux host.
Scp's between the guest and host only manage about 5KB/s so I tried going
back to le which worked great. I configured a new kernel with "disable
pcn*" but on next boot I had no nics at all, so i tried again "disable pc
Anyone,
Router A
-
$ sudo bgpctl show rib
flags: * = Valid, > = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete
flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
AI*> 10.0.0.1/32 0.0.0.0100 0 i
I*> 10.0.0.3/32
Aleksandar Milosevic wrote:
J. Alfred Prufrock wrote:
Also, I just noticed in my cable-modem box's configuration page that
the WAN gateway is 24.145.134.65, which reverse dns shows to be
user-0c931i1.cable.mindspring.com.
Isn't it odd that my gateway is another user rather than the ISP?
Should
On 2/9/07, Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a PERC 3/Di on an old Dell 2650, dmesg doesn't show that much info
it's just that there's no disk and PERC 3/Di is not-configured seems like
dell still hasn't budge .. seems like it's an old issue old donkey-dell..
Yank out the RAID "KEY" a
hi Steve,
I have a PERC 3/Di on an old Dell 2650, dmesg doesn't show that much info
it's just that there's no disk and PERC 3/Di is not-configured seems like
dell still hasn't budge .. seems like it's an old issue old donkey-dell..
-Ed
On 2/9/07, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
I'll try that jack thanks
-ed
On 2/9/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Beavis wrote:
>
> yup jack... just saw it when i did the google specifically for PERC 3Di
>
>
> The one thing I remember from all my Dell Fu is that if you disable all
> the raid st
On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:09, you wrote:
> Hi guys
>
>Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to
> a dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it
> always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an
> initi
Beavis wrote:
Hi guys
Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a
dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it
always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an
initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured
On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Beavis wrote:
Hi guys
Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd
4.0 to a
dell 2650?
Sure. Me and the the thirty or so other people who have posted to
this subject
in the past year or two, Beavis!
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=open
Hi,
I have a brand new Dell Poweredge 850 with two 160 G SAS disks attached
to a Perc 5IR controller card.
In the BIOS, I have configured them as an IM (Integrated Mirror) Logical
Volume. I have synchronized the mirror, and the array is activated.
I have played with various BIOS settings,
On 2/9/07, Jochen Fabricius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my current pf.conf:
> ext_if="pppoe0"
> int_if="dc0"
> localnet=$int_if:network
>
> nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any -> ($ext_if)
> block all
> pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
>
I think there must be another
Hi guys
Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a
dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it
always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an
initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured) and see if 4.0
> my current pf.conf:
> ext_if="pppoe0"
> int_if="dc0"
> localnet=$int_if:network
>
> nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any -> ($ext_if)
> block all
> pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
>
I think there must be another line:
pass out on $ext_if all
Because "nat" processes
On 2007/02/09 22:10, Per Christian Bechstrxm Viken wrote:
> The problem is, that only about 50% of things work. Sites like
> slashdot.org and google.com works, while vg.no (norwegian newspaper),
> msn messenger and CS: Source (Steam) does not.
>
> Obviously, this is not an acceptable situation, an
I've been considering switching my Linux+iptables-based router with
one running OpenBSD and pf for a while now. And a recent hardware
failure gave me a good opportunity to do so.
After looking (http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/ and
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ mostly), I've managed to get
conn
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:14:27PM +0100, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that.
>
> It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it?
>
Using a compiled FI
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that.
>
> It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it?
Addon cards can always be done. I am pretty sure that one could dev
Salut,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that.
It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it?
> While IPv6 has a static header size it uses header stacking and so every
> router has to do the sa
Hello.
While trying to configure pf to pass dhcp requests I've build a simple rule:
block log all
pass in log on $inf_if proto udp from { $int_if:network 0.0.0.0 } \
port 68 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
But it seems that above rule pass out udp to port 68 (like it was having
keep state add
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:27:26PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> i am setting up a firewall and would like to block any packet
> destinated to a multicast address with a protocol not equal to udp. Is
> this a sound rule? Is it possible?
>
Sure it is possible if it is sound
Dear list members,
i am setting up a firewall and would like to block any packet
destinated to a multicast address with a protocol not equal to udp. Is
this a sound rule? Is it possible?
Thanks.
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 17:39 +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote:
> Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL
> specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that
> there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a
> technical
There is no way in hell that this type of garbage will EVER make it in
OpenBSD. Unlike Linux, OpenBSD *is* free.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote:
> Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL
> specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote:
> Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL
> specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that
Speaking only for myself, freedesktop.org HAL is a horrible, nasty
thing. They
Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL
specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that
there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a
technical reason why this hasn't been implemented yet, or is the reason
simp
Bonjour, Afin de stimuler votre force de vente et fidiliser vos clients,
Promocadeaux leader du cadeau d'entreprise en Europe, vous propose ses
dernihres nouveautis : GPS, cli USB, textile publicitaire.23.000
rifirences en ligne sur www.promocadeaux.com. Dans l'attente de votre
visite, Veuillez agr
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=117087499332720&w=2
--Siju
Further info on the problem below. The past two nights the failover
has happened at between 12:03am and 12:05am both nights. Looking at
traffic graphs, I don't see any spikes or anomolies at all. The
first time we had 4 mbuf errors, and checking today, the total is 8,
so in both cases th
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:45:35AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anybody,
>
>
> If I have two internal routers, say RouterB(ext: 172.16.111.253/32 and int:
> 10.77.222.254/32) and
> RouterC(ext: 10.77.222.253/32 and int: 10.222.77.254/32), and these two
> routers had already
> established a
Anybody,
If I have two internal routers, say RouterB(ext: 172.16.111.253/32 and int:
10.77.222.254/32) and
RouterC(ext: 10.77.222.253/32 and int: 10.222.77.254/32), and these two routers
had already
established a BGP session. Now, let us say I will have Router B in BGP with
RouterA(ext: Intern
Rodney Hopkins wrote:
I want to run a NFS server on OpenBSD with pf enabled
and configured only allow the required inbound ports
needed to allow NFS mounts to work.
The thing is, the only way I've successfully been
able to do this is to exclude ports <1024 from being
blocked inbound by pf.
is there a way i can get more usb diagnostics?
it seems that USBVERBOSE is on by default in the kernels.
i would like to get some insight into what's happening
when the disk (seemingly without reasons) detaches.
some more tests yesterday: i used the disk without
problems for more than 3 hours in w
sorry again :-( this was supposed to goto BSD-India.
on pills and drowsy
--Siju
On 2/9/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=117087499332720&w=2
--Siju
34 matches
Mail list logo
