Hi Martell,
On 06/29/15 12:45, Martell Malone wrote:
>
> It shouldn't be based on readdir, because it can't be made
> reentrant this way. I'd suggest changing the existing
> implementation to
> have reentrant semantic and reimplement readdit on top of that.
>
>
> Forgive my ignoran
>
> I'm not fun of adding more extensions like that. However I can see that
> we already provide readdir that is not present in MSVC, so it may make
> sense to provide _r variant as well.
Yes this is the reason I added it
Please compile test your code before asking for review :P
> Anyway, beside
Hi Martell,
On 06/27/15 18:02, Martell Malone wrote:
> Attached is a patch for adding readdir_r
>
> I would like to ask should I make this __forceinline ?
> like the localtime_r and gmtime_r functions?
I'm not fun of adding more extensions like that. However I can see that
we already provide read
Attached is a patch for adding readdir_r
I would like to ask should I make this __forceinline ?
like the localtime_r and gmtime_r functions?
Please Review :)
From 22d04235c9e4e04442f2f93c53e84d95bff331a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martell Malone
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:00:01 +0100
Subject:
