Thanks, Jacek!
Yes, I agree that it would be better to have a single header.
--David
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> It's great to see the work on this.
>
> I took a quick look at your Git and I noticed that currently those
> headers are split into a few oth
Hi David,
It's great to see the work on this.
I took a quick look at your Git and I noticed that currently those
headers are split into a few other headers. It would be better to merge
them in the final version. Otherwise we'd be introducing mingw-w64
specific headers and that's better avoided IM
Oops, I sent that email too early and it was malformed. I meant to
say that you can follow my progress and see some different
implementations of
intsafe.h here:
https://github.com/DavidEGrayson/intsafe
--David
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, David Grayson wrote:
> I have been working on mak
I have been working on making an intsafe.h that is suitable for being
added to mingw-w64 and just wanted to give a status update.
Some background: The intsafe.h header provided by Microsoft has 253
inline functions for safe conversions, additions, multiplications, and
subtractions of integers. Th
