Hi,
2015-02-03 4:25 GMT+01:00 K. Frank :
> Hi Carl (and Pieter)!
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Carl Kleffner
> wrote:
> > The Windows ABI - see
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235286.aspx
> > - differes from the
> > System V ABI - see http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pd
Hi Carl (and Pieter)!
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote:
> The Windows ABI - see https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235286.aspx
> - differes from the
> System V ABI - see http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf.
>
> MingW-W64 sets the x87 FPU control word register to
The Windows ABI - see https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235286.aspx
- differes from the
System V ABI - see http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf.
MingW-W64 sets the x87 FPU control word register to extended precision. The
'standard' for Windows however is 'double precision'. See
ht
Hi Pieter!
This could be complete misinformation, or correct but
not relevant.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:57 PM, wrote:
> I wrote a test program in fortran and used gfortran 4.9.2 (tdm64-gcc 4.9.2)
> ...
> However for extended floating point precision off-diagonal elements of the
> identity mat
I wrote a test program in fortran and used gfortran 4.9.2(tdm64-gcc 4.9.2) with
openmp to make me familiar with parallel processing. Theprogram does matrix
inversion.
I tested for different floating point precisions.
For single, double and quadruple floating point precisioneverything seem
