Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Dongsheng Song
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: >> 2014-11-07

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : > >> On 11/7/14, Dongs

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Dongsheng Song
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : > On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: > > If we define _POS

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: >>> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : >>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. > Is it correc

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ray Donnelly
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: >> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : >> >>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: >>> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. >>> > Is it correct ? >>> > >>> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : > >> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: >> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. >> > Is it correct ? >> > >> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not >> > use _POSIX_

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer : > On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: > > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. > > Is it correct ? > > > > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not > > use _POSIX_ anymore. > > MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid wit

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-07 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote: > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. > Is it correct ? > > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not > use _POSIX_ anymore. > MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__. I believe (but not necessarily correct ab

[Mingw-w64-public] getpid issue

2014-11-06 Thread Dongsheng Song
If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden. Is it correct ? PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not use _POSIX_ anymore. MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__. --