;
"mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net"
*Sent:* Monday, June 6, 2016 2:30 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
I for one am grateful for the configure script. I’m sure I’m not alone.
Ruben
Van: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Verzonden: maandag 6 juni 2016 21:49
Aan: mi
I for one am grateful for the configure script. I’m sure I’m not alone.
Ruben
Van: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Verzonden: maandag 6 juni 2016 21:49
Aan: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
On 06 Jun, Ozkan Sezer wrote :
> Not everyone would h
On 06 Jun, Ozkan Sezer wrote :
> Not everyone would have the required autofoo installed on their
> systems to generate the configury. To me, it is polite to have the
> generated files as they are intended to be in the repo.
If you don't have autotools, then why are you compiling mingw64? If you
ar
p/gcc
---
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2016-06-07
-
发件人：Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
发送日期：2016-06-07 00:37
收件人：mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
抄送：
主题：[Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
Hi,
I'm wondering about the rational
On 6/6/16, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering about the rational for having all autotools generated
> files commited to the git repository.
> Is there a specific reason for that? Or would it be OK to provide a
> patch that adds a bootstrap script for all project & removes the said
Hi,
I'm wondering about the rational for having all autotools generated
files commited to the git repository.
Is there a specific reason for that? Or would it be OK to provide a
patch that adds a bootstrap script for all project & removes the said
generated files?
Regards,
---
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, JonY wrote:
>
> iirc Perl 5.8 for MSYS is out, you could try to persuade the maintainers
> to make it threaded.
>
That would be Chuck Wilson who IIRC monitors this list but discussion
should happen at mingw-us...@lists.sourceforge.net.
--
Earnie
-- https://sites
On 1/6/2012 01:29, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> You should try the mingw package, msys is unmaintained, while the
> recent cygwin introduced proper mingw-w64 and recent auto tools which
> make it a great alternative.
>
This really has nothing to do with MSYS, though I do encourage using
Cygwin over it o
You should try the mingw package, msys is unmaintained, while the
recent cygwin introduced proper mingw-w64 and recent auto tools which
make it a great alternative.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Patrick von Reth
wrote:
>
> Hi the autotools package contains a broken symbolic link,
> autotools\s
Hi the autotools package contains a broken symbolic link,
autotools\share\aclocal points to /usr/share/aclocal wont work if extracted
with a normal tool.
Also if the package gets updated can you please build it with disabled perl
threads?
The msys-perl doesn't support threads so some autotools oper
On 8/10/2011 01:12, Jon wrote:
>> On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> 2011/8/9 Earnie :
Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>> to use autotools...
>>
> On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2011/8/9 Earnie :
> >> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> >>
> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
> to use autotools...
> >>>
> >>> Bull shit. Hardly a so
On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2011/8/9 Earnie :
>> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>
Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
to use autotools...
>>>
>>> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for
2011/8/9 Earnie :
> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
>>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>>> to use autotools...
>>
>> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for the direct words, but you
>> can't possibly force a
Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>> to use autotools...
>
> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for the direct words, but you
> can't possibly force autotools on the world. I ha
15 matches
Mail list logo
