brary. here is the only error message.
Try rev3.
i686-4.8.2-release-win32-sjlj-rt_v3-rev3.7z
Regards,
Alexey.
>
> ===[snip]
> Jim Michaels
> From: Ray Donnelly
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public]
uot;here" who said "that"
>about "it". Would it be possible for you to connect the dots please?
>
>
>>
>> ____
>> From: Kai Tietz
>> To: "mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 AM
>
> From: Kai Tietz
> To: "mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Sigh! Back To Microsoft Compiler
>
> 2014-02-20 1:16 GMT+01:00 Ciro Cornejo :
>> Seriously? !!!
>&
but I thought that it was said here that the win32 version does not work with
sjlj in a stable way - yet?
>
> From: Kai Tietz
>To: "mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net"
>
>Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 AM
>Subject:
2014-02-20 12:47 GMT+01:00 Hannes Domani :
> Hello
>
> Kai Tietz schrieb am 10:14 Donnerstag, 20.Februar
> 2014:
>
>> I would advice you to look in more detail to license issues. MS
>> compiler has them, and gcc & mingw(-w64) do so too. You will be
>> wondering what other licenses you are using
Hello
Kai Tietz schrieb am 10:14 Donnerstag, 20.Februar
2014:
> I would advice you to look in more detail to license issues. MS
> compiler has them, and gcc & mingw(-w64) do so too. You will be
> wondering what other licenses you are using for just building a simple
> hello-world-application
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014, Ciro Cornejo wrote:
> Seriously? !!!
>
> Come on guys, this makes the compiler unusable.
>
> ...but as long as you're making a toy compiler, would you consider making one
> that does not support pthreads and so avoids this problem?
I think we will all skip the "toy" q
2014-02-20 10:19 GMT+01:00 LRN :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> To be precise, it's a MIT license[1]. The text OP is referring to is
> explained in [2].
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License
> [2]
> https://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/178486/what-exact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20.02.2014 13:14, Kai Tietz wrote:
> On 2014-02-20 1:16 GMT+01:00 Ciro Cornejo wrote:
>> Seriously? !!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Come on guys, this makes the compiler unusable.
>
> What?
>
>>
>>
>> ...but as long as you're making a toy compiler, would you
2014-02-20 1:16 GMT+01:00 Ciro Cornejo :
> Seriously? !!!
>
>
>
> Come on guys, this makes the compiler unusable.
What?
>
>
> ...but as long as you're making a toy compiler, would you consider making
> one that does not support pthreads and so avoids this problem?
>
Why we should make a compiler
Seriously? !!!
Come on guys, this makes the compiler unusable.
...but as long as you're making a toy compiler, would you consider making one
that does not support pthreads and so avoids this problem?
Thanks.
Hi! Sorry for the interruption, but you may want to take at least a few seconds
to loo
11 matches
Mail list logo