On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> I'll try to get a complete CVS GNU make checkout. Anyone on the list know
> how to resurrect dead files from a CVS repo? Or if there is a good svn
> mirror, or perhaps a near-complete GNU make clone other than jom?
You have to know the re
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
> That's interesting. I'll check out mingw-builds' patches.
>
--8<--
>
> True, but at least all CMake generated Makefiles work great as well. Maybe
> you could push for better MinGW support in jom ;-).
>
> I'll try to get a complete CVS GNU
2012/9/28 Koehne Kai
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ext Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:47 AM
> > To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Problem with ming
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:47 AM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Problem with mingw32-make and long
> commands (x86_64-w64-mingw32
2012/9/28 Koehne Kai
> Hi Ruben,
>
> I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long compiler
> line: http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a buffer
> limit here ... However, if I replace your mingw32-make
>
> GNU Make 3.82
> Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32
>
> With the
On 9/28/12, niXman wrote:
> 2012/9/28 Koehne Kai:
>> Hi Ruben,
>>
>> I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long compiler
>> line: http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a buffer
>> limit here ... However, if I replace your mingw32-make
>>
>> GNU Make 3.82
>> Built
Hi,
yes this difference is caused - IIRC - by a change of process-spawning
in mingw,org's make. Not sure if this patch is already upstream, but
the limitted command-line-buffer o 8k can be extended to 32k buffer by
using CreateProcess directly instead of using CMD.exe here.
See for some details
2012/9/28 Koehne Kai:
> Hi Ruben,
>
> I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long compiler line:
> http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a buffer limit here
> ... However, if I replace your mingw32-make
>
> GNU Make 3.82
> Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32
>
> With th
Hi Ruben,
I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long compiler line:
http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a buffer limit here ...
However, if I replace your mingw32-make
GNU Make 3.82
Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32
With the one from latest mingw-builds:
GNU M
2010/8/27 Chris Sutcliffe :
> On 26 August 2010 11:52, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> On 26 August 2010 11:10, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
Given the assumption that PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR *is* redundant for VMS
and HAVE_DOS_PATHS. Once we have s
On 26 August 2010 11:52, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 11:10, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> Given the assumption that PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR *is* redundant for VMS
>>> and HAVE_DOS_PATHS. Once we have something that we both think would
On 26 August 2010 11:10, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> Given the assumption that PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR *is* redundant for VMS
>> and HAVE_DOS_PATHS. Once we have something that we both think would
>> work, I'll bring this up on the make-w32 mailing l
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 4:58 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>>> On 8/26/2010 2:47 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wr
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 09:37, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> I'm by no means a 'sed' guru, so the script I came up with is very basic:
>>>
>>> mv config.h config.orig ; sed -e 's/:/;/' config.or
On 26 August 2010 09:37, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> I'm by no means a 'sed' guru, so the script I came up with is very basic:
>>
>> mv config.h config.orig ; sed -e 's/:/;/' config.orig > config.h
>
> Thanks.
>
> However this is a problem with th
On 8/26/2010 4:58 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>> On 8/26/2010 2:47 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vasilakiswrote:
On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakis
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:47 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>>> On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wr
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 09:01, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> Ah! Chris, thank you very much! That escaped my attention.
>
> I felt bad myself, in that I ran in to the same issue back in 2008.
> Between building the mingw.org make 3.81 and 3.82 I had a
On 26 August 2010 09:01, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> Ah! Chris, thank you very much! That escaped my attention.
I felt bad myself, in that I ran in to the same issue back in 2008.
Between building the mingw.org make 3.81 and 3.82 I had a HD failure
and forgot the 'sed' step myself which resulted in th
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 07:47, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> Interesting. AFAIK, the only source difference between make-3.82-1
>> and make-3.82-3 from mingw.org is the size of an array (PATH_MAX
>> definition change), so: does make-3.82-1 from mingw.o
On 26 August 2010 07:47, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> Interesting. AFAIK, the only source difference between make-3.82-1
> and make-3.82-3 from mingw.org is the size of an array (PATH_MAX
> definition change), so: does make-3.82-1 from mingw.org work for you?
Actually that was an ill-advised patch by me
On 8/26/2010 2:47 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>> On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakiswrote:
On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakis
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>>> On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer w
On 8/26/2010 2:29 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>> On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakiswrote:
On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakis
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>>> On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakis wrote:
> I have installed both
>
>
On 8/26/2010 2:11 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
>> On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakiswrote:
I have installed both
sezero_20100711_w32_runtime_update_3405.zip
mingw-w32
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Vasilakis wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakis wrote:
>>> I have installed both
>>>
>>> sezero_20100711_w32_runtime_update_3405.zip
>>> mingw-w32-bin_i686-mingw_20100711_sezero.zip
>>>
>>> on my Windo
On 8/26/2010 11:34 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakis wrote:
>> I have installed both
>>
>> sezero_20100711_w32_runtime_update_3405.zip
>> mingw-w32-bin_i686-mingw_20100711_sezero.zip
>>
>> on my Windows XP SP3 x86 machine. I tried to compile
>>
>> tbb30_20100
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Vasilakis wrote:
> I have installed both
>
> sezero_20100711_w32_runtime_update_3405.zip
> mingw-w32-bin_i686-mingw_20100711_sezero.zip
>
> on my Windows XP SP3 x86 machine. I tried to compile
>
> tbb30_20100406oss_src.tgz
>
> but to no avail. Build command 'ming
I have installed both
sezero_20100711_w32_runtime_update_3405.zip
mingw-w32-bin_i686-mingw_20100711_sezero.zip
on my Windows XP SP3 x86 machine. I tried to compile
tbb30_20100406oss_src.tgz
but to no avail. Build command 'mingw32-make compiler=gcc'
Installing the program
make-3.82-3-mingw32
30 matches
Mail list logo
