Here is a ready-made Windows installer:
http://llvm.org/builds/
2015-06-10 3:35 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Pereira Nunes :
> Well, I never ran Clang before, so this'll be an opportunity :-)
>
> Em seg, 8 de jun de 2015 às 19:07, Ivan Garramona <
> heavenandhell...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> 2015-06-08
Well, I never ran Clang before, so this'll be an opportunity :-)
Em seg, 8 de jun de 2015 às 19:07, Ivan Garramona <
heavenandhell...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> 2015-06-08 10:07 GMT-03:00 Yaron Keren :
>
>> Ah yes, for gcc it is required.
>> Have you looked at clang implementation? it support native
2015-06-08 10:07 GMT-03:00 Yaron Keren :
> Ah yes, for gcc it is required.
> Have you looked at clang implementation? it support native TLS, it would
> be really nice if the implementation would be compatible.
>
>
Yeah it would be nice indeed. Few days ago a tried to build LLD with
Clang+Mingw64,
Ah yes, for gcc it is required.
Have you looked at clang implementation? it support native TLS, it would be
really nice if the implementation would be compatible.
2015-06-08 15:58 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Pereira Nunes <
alexandre.nu...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, but I'd need to patch GCC as well. The bureauc
Yes, but I'd need to patch GCC as well. The bureaucracies are regarding the
Free Software Foundation Copyright claims on it, they need a copyright
transfer or waiver.
Em seg, 8 de jun de 2015 às 09:52, Yaron Keren
escreveu:
> This is a great idea.
>
> Regarding the license, isn't mingw-w64 relea
This is a great idea.
Regarding the license, isn't mingw-w64 released under a public domain or
CC0 license?
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/mingw-w64-public/thread/5238f91b.7010...@tdragon.net/
2015-06-08 15:41 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Pereira Nunes <
alexandre.nu...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I read in the mailing list archives that some work was done on the area of
implementing native TLS support and I'm interested in continuing it, in
case nobody is currently on it.
My initial goal would be to have an implementation that would be both
thread-model agnostic (i.e. be both sufficien
