On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/11/23 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
>> wrote:
>>> Assuming you are still updating 1.0, this comes from a bug report on
>>> R built with a toolchain from Sept 2010 (but the bug is still present
>>> in t
2011/11/23 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
> wrote:
>> Assuming you are still updating 1.0, this comes from a bug report on
>> R built with a toolchain from Sept 2010 (but the bug is still present
>> in the 1.0 branch).
>>
>> Suppose x is what is called in the C
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> Assuming you are still updating 1.0, this comes from a bug report on
> R built with a toolchain from Sept 2010 (but the bug is still present
> in the 1.0 branch).
>
> Suppose x is what is called in the C code MAXNUM, the maximum
> normal
Assuming you are still updating 1.0, this comes from a bug report on
R built with a toolchain from Sept 2010 (but the bug is still present
in the 1.0 branch).
Suppose x is what is called in the C code MAXNUM, the maximum
normalized double. Then pow(x, y) is computed as INF for 0 < y <= 1,
whe
