Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Alexey Pavlov
2013/11/13 Ruben Van Boxem > Op 12-nov.-2013 21:11 schreef "Alexey Pavlov" : > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/11/13 Jon > >> > >> Understood. > >> > >> I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd > like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites and trying to > ple

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
Op 12-nov.-2013 21:11 schreef "Alexey Pavlov" : > > > > > 2013/11/13 Jon >> >> Understood. >> >> I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites and trying to please all of us, BASE will become too large. >> >> The be

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Alexey Pavlov
2013/11/13 Jon > Understood. > > I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd > like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites and trying to > please all of us, BASE will become too large. > > The beauty of pacman is that it is easy for any of use to enhance B

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Zach Thibeau
As is I think would be fine, just include basic instructions for the end user and let them do what they want On Nov 12, 2013 3:06 PM, "Jon" wrote: > Understood. > > I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd > like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites a

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Jon
Understood. I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites and trying to please all of us, BASE will become too large. The beauty of pacman is that it is easy for any of use to enhance BASE to ones specific needs.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Alexey Pavlov
2013/11/12 Jon > Why were the following packages not selected for inclusion in this version > of the BASE download? > > msys autoconf 2.69-1 > msys automake 1.14-1 > msys libtool 2.4.2-1 > > There are many candidates to BASE group but need to understand that it increase size. I want to sug

[Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 BASE package selection

2013-11-12 Thread Jon
Why were the following packages not selected for inclusion in this version of the BASE download? msys autoconf 2.69-1 msys automake 1.14-1 msys libtool 2.4.2-1 -- DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for H