On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:58 AM, dw wrote:
>
>> If you can prepare patches for your recent asm stuff against the stable
>> branch, I would happily merge.
>
> It might make sense to hold off on this a bit. I have several more that I'm
> working on.
>
OK,
> Also, I hate asking questions that expos
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:26 AM, dw wrote:
> I have found some problems with the InterlockedBitTestAndXXX functions. For
> example:
>
> - Despite sezero's recent update, they still don't all have the "memory"
> clobber.
> - The constraints for the 64bit versions are incorrect (I vs J).
> - There
On 6/3/2013 05:40, Kai Tietz wrote:
> patch is ok for apply. JonY could take care? (thanks i advance)
Checked in as trunk r5877.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.
patch is ok for apply. JonY could take care? (thanks i advance)
Thanks
Kai
Am 02.06.2013 23:26 schrieb "dw" :
> I have found some problems with the InterlockedBitTestAndXXX functions.
> For example:
>
> - Despite sezero's recent update, they still don't all have the "memory"
> clobber.
> - The
I have found some problems with the InterlockedBitTestAndXXX functions.
For example:
- Despite sezero's recent update, they still don't all have the "memory"
clobber.
- The constraints for the 64bit versions are incorrect (I vs J).
- There is no library definition for interlockedbittestandcom
