Thanks, pushed without _WIN32 guard.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Sure, it has to.
>
> Kai
>
> 2014-09-03 12:06 GMT+02:00 Dongsheng Song :
>> Did ARM target support these features or defined _WIN32 ?
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> To
Sure, it has to.
Kai
2014-09-03 12:06 GMT+02:00 Dongsheng Song :
> Did ARM target support these features or defined _WIN32 ?
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To move code up is ok. Patch is ok, but one nit. Why do you check
>> here _WIN32 as guard. Do we have
Did ARM target support these features or defined _WIN32 ?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To move code up is ok. Patch is ok, but one nit. Why do you check
> here _WIN32 as guard. Do we have targets where _WIN32 isn't defined?
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
> 2014-09-03 5:33 GM
Hi,
To move code up is ok. Patch is ok, but one nit. Why do you check
here _WIN32 as guard. Do we have targets where _WIN32 isn't defined?
Cheers,
Kai
2014-09-03 5:33 GMT+02:00 Dongsheng Song :
> Hi,
>
> This patch fix compile error in commctrl.h
>
> Ok for apply?
>
> Regards,
> Dongsheng
>
>
Hi,
This patch fix compile error in commctrl.h
Ok for apply?
Regards,
Dongsheng
From 8b0831b0a5b778379f50023e6c8e16c8851f8a43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=AE=8B=E5=86=AC=E7=94=9F?=
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:57:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile error in commctrl.h
---
ming
