2012/8/17 Ozkan Sezer
> On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> >>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
> >>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
> >>> guard against an application
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 14:12, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> Am 17.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
>> gcc/system.h has its declaration guarded by #if defined
>> (HAVE_DECL_GETCWD) && !HAVE_DECL_GETCWD ... so the question is why
>> doesn't it work and the header h
On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
>>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
>>> guard against an application using the CRT functions that are n
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
>> guard against an application using the CRT functions that are not
>> supported "in the Windows Runti
On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>> That's a good question, it seems like MSVC has only one declaration in
>> direct.h. I don't know why do we have it duplicated in io.h. IMO we
>> should consider removing it from there, leaving only direct.h
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> That's a good question, it seems like MSVC has only one declaration in
> direct.h. I don't know why do we have it duplicated in io.h. IMO we
> should consider removing it from there, leaving only direct.h version.
My guess is that the MS dire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
> gcc/system.h has its declaration guarded by #if defined (HAVE_DECL_GETCWD)
> && !HAVE_DECL_GETCWD ... so the question is why doesn't it work and the
> header has to declare a library function by itself?
>
in
2012/8/17 Ozkan Sezer
> On 8/17/12, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
> >
> >> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> >> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> >> > > Hallo Rainer,
> >> >
> >> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> >> > >
On 8/17/12, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
>
>> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
>> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
>> > > Hallo Rainer,
>> >
>> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
>> > > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'.
On 08/17/12 11:33, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Am 17.08.2012 09:37, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> > After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
> > declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping
> > gcc-4.8.0.
>
> > In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0
2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> > > Hallo Rainer,
> >
> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> > > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> > > seaching on
On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> > Hallo Rainer,
>
> > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> > seaching on msdn for getcwd. For 32-bit it is just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> Hallo Rainer,
>
> well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> seaching on msdn for getcwd. For 32-bit it is just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 09:37, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
> declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping
> gcc-4.8.0.
>
> In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/
Hallo Rainer,
well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
seaching on msdn for getcwd.
For 32-bit it is just a sign-difference of this argument, which is
pretty unlikely to reach (0x7fffu + 1u). For 64-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping gcc-4.8.0.
In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/ggc-common.c:25:0:
../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/syste
16 matches
Mail list logo
