On 5/13/2012 00:21, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
> Dear list readers,
>
>>> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
>>> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
>>> "derecommendation".
>> Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
>> some
Dear list readers,
>> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
>> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
>> "derecommendation".
> Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
> some critical differences from other GCC distributions
On 5/12/2012 3:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
> "derecommendation".
Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
some critical differences from othe
2012/5/12 John E. / TDM
> On 5/11/2012 9:10 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > Yes, TDM's toolchain is a native build. but please don't use it, it's
> > old (by now) and as you can see has installation problems
>
> :(
>
> With these two frankly unfounded generalizations, you may be scaring off
> quit
On 5/11/2012 9:10 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Yes, TDM's toolchain is a native build. but please don't use it, it's
> old (by now) and as you can see has installation problems
:(
With these two frankly unfounded generalizations, you may be scaring off
quite a few innocent readers who might hav
Op 11 mei 2012 20:32 schreef "Erik van Pienbroek"
het volgende:
>
> Ruben Van Boxem schreef op vr 11-05-2012 om 17:10 [+0200]:
>
> > Remember to add the -qt-style-windows* options when you call Qt's
> > configure or you'll get ugly Windows 95 style GUI's for all you Qt
> > programs.
>
> If your mk
MARTIN Pierre schreef op vr 11-05-2012 om 20:42 [+0200]:
> All right, but apart from creating your custom mkspec, did you need any
> particular patching of the Qt source?
In Fedora we applied various patches to Qt to fix some issues which
aren't resolved upstream yet or are Fedora specific. It sh
Dear Erik,
First of all, i really appreciate you taking time to answer me.
> The qmake build system doesn't work with build triplets, but with
> so-called mkspecs profiles. These profiles are located in the mkspecs
> folder which is part of the Qt source tarball.
Right.
> If you open the file mk
Ruben Van Boxem schreef op vr 11-05-2012 om 17:10 [+0200]:
> Remember to add the -qt-style-windows* options when you call Qt's
> configure or you'll get ugly Windows 95 style GUI's for all you Qt
> programs.
If your mkspecs name starts with "win32-g++" then these
qt-style-windows* options will be
MARTIN Pierre schreef op vr 11-05-2012 om 15:58 [+0200]:
> Now, i am trying to configure Qt 4.8.1 to compile it with MinGW-w64 (i
> am willing to compile it on windows XP 32 bits for Windows XP 32
> bits). But my problem right now is that i can't seem to understand how
> to give it the build tripl
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
>>
>> > Yes, you will, but depending on how you build them, you'll need to point
>> > the project's build infrastructure to find the Qt you've built. There's
>> > nothing special about MSYS, it's only an emulation o
> Take a look at GNUWin32 they have a lot of the programs you'd want, for use
> with cmd. The shell remains the same old non-functional cruft, but you get
> ls, file, find, etc... Just remember GNU find is not Windows find, and some
> stuff might expect the Windows version.
Thanks for the tip!--
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
> > Yes, you will, but depending on how you build them, you'll need to point
> the project's build infrastructure to find the Qt you've built. There's
> nothing special about MSYS, it's only an emulation of a POSIX shell on top
> of Windows.
> Perfect. Thanks Ruben :) Just
> Yes, you will, but depending on how you build them, you'll need to point the
> project's build infrastructure to find the Qt you've built. There's nothing
> special about MSYS, it's only an emulation of a POSIX shell on top of Windows.
Perfect. Thanks Ruben :) Just for my personal information,
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
> > No, it's not related to the toolchain. This is Qt's configure not
> working on MSYS. Specifically, -DUNICODE is missing from the compiler
> options.
> It's working with SeZero's build. i'm really wondering what's different in
> his build.
>
> > I must *strongly* urge
> No, it's not related to the toolchain. This is Qt's configure not working on
> MSYS. Specifically, -DUNICODE is missing from the compiler options.
It's working with SeZero's build. i'm really wondering what's different in his
build.
> I must *strongly* urge you to try building Qt from cmd ins
2012/5/11 Kai Tietz
> 2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre :
> > The last toolchain i have downloaded is the one from TDM's. i'm trying
> to compile Qt 4.8.1 with it, and it fails where SeZero's build was
> successfull.
> > The error message i get is when compiling QMake (Which takes place in
> the ./configur
Kai,
>> Creating qmake. Please wait...
>> g++ -c -o project.o -DQMAKE_OPENSOURCE_EDITION -g -I. -Igenerators
>> -Igenerators/unix -Igenerators/win32 -Igenerators/ma
>> c -Igenerators/symbian -Igenerators/integrity
>> -I/QtSDK/Desktop/Qt/4.8.1/i686-w64-mingw32/include -I/QtSDK/Desktop/Qt/4.8
>>
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre :
> The last toolchain i have downloaded is the one from TDM's. i'm trying to
> compile Qt 4.8.1 with it, and it fails where SeZero's build was successfull.
> The error message i get is when compiling QMake (Which takes place in the
> ./configure part):
>
> Creating qmake.
The last toolchain i have downloaded is the one from TDM's. i'm trying to
compile Qt 4.8.1 with it, and it fails where SeZero's build was successfull.
The error message i get is when compiling QMake (Which takes place in the
./configure part):
Creating qmake. Please wait...
g++ -c -o project.o
>> - When using the Europe -> France -> Free mirror, the package
>> make-3.82-mingw32-bin.tar.lzma cannot be found on the server (404 type
>> error). Is Dragon part of this list, or is it another project mailing list i
>> shall subscribe to to report the problems i encounter?
> Hmm, I heard that so
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre :
> Dear Ruben, dear list readers,
>
>> I suggest using a native MinGW-w64 toolchain to build Qt. Qt does not
>> support cross-compiling (just look at the OpenSuse or Fedora mingw-w64 Qt
>> package build scripts: they patch the hell out of Qt's build
>> infrastructure).
>>
>
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
> Dear Ruben, dear list readers,
>
> I suggest using a native MinGW-w64 toolchain to build Qt. Qt does not
>> support cross-compiling (just look at the OpenSuse or Fedora mingw-w64 Qt
>> package build scripts: they patch the hell out of Qt's build
>> infrastructure).
>>
>>
Dear Ruben, dear list readers,
>> I suggest using a native MinGW-w64 toolchain to build Qt. Qt does not
>> support cross-compiling (just look at the OpenSuse or Fedora mingw-w64 Qt
>> package build scripts: they patch the hell out of Qt's build infrastructure).
>
> Ah! But i *am* using a native
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
> Dear Ruben,
>
> First, thank you very much for your kind help.
>
> Is there anyone here successfull in compiling Qt 4.8.1 with MinGW-w64
>> using MSys? If yes, how?
>>
>
> No, it's not intended to be built from MSYS on windows. It might work, but
> is not recommended (by
Dear Ruben,
First, thank you very much for your kind help.
> Is there anyone here successfull in compiling Qt 4.8.1 with MinGW-w64 using
> MSys? If yes, how?
>
> No, it's not intended to be built from MSYS on windows. It might work, but is
> not recommended (by me nor Nokia). This problem thou
Hallo Kai,
> sure there are a lot of people building Qt by using mingw-w64 (for
> 32-bit and 64-bit version).
i would really be interested to know about their setup / configure options, as
the automated MinGw binary doesn't works for me.
Please note that i just have downloaded SeZero MinGW build,
2012/5/11 MARTIN Pierre
> Dear list readers,
>
> As you might remember, i have been playing around with MinGW-w64 on MSys
> to see if it could be of a good replacement for compiling on / for windows.
> i finally have dropped the migration, as i was seriously lacking some
> research time.
>
> Now
Hallo,
sure there are a lot of people building Qt by using mingw-w64 (for
32-bit and 64-bit version).
Have you checked on our Wiki the following links?
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/MSYS
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/BuildingQt
Regards,
Kai
-
Dear list readers,
As you might remember, i have been playing around with MinGW-w64 on MSys to see
if it could be of a good replacement for compiling on / for windows.
i finally have dropped the migration, as i was seriously lacking some research
time.
Now that i have a bit time for me again, i
30 matches
Mail list logo
